On Friday 04 December 2009 04:40:32 David Howells wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > 	+	flush_icache_range(mm->brk, brk);
> > > 		return mm->brk = brk;
> > > 	 }
> >
> > probably want mm->brk + brk for the second argument
> 
> Ummm...  Why?  mm->brk and brk are both addresses - note the return
>  statement where brk just gets assigned to mm->brk.

yeah, sorry.  i was thinking sbrk where the argument is an increment, not a 
new address.
-mike