From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
To: djwong@us.ibm.com
Cc: lenb@kernel.org, Crane Cai <crane.cai@amd.com>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] acpi: support IBM SMBus CMI devices
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:36:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200912041036.36686.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091204170621.GA10356@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com>
On Friday 04 December 2009 10:06:21 am Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:36:19PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:30:01 -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:03:32PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm only half please with this. You change the function named, but it
> > > > doesn't follow the calling convention of acpi_dock_match(), which is a
> > > > little confusing.
> > > >
> > > > Anyway, I will need an ack from the ACPI people before I can pick this
> > > > patch. Or maybe they should even push it upstream themselves.
>
> Len/Bjorn: Any opinion on this ACPI quirk patch to make i2c-scmi work on IBM
> systems? I think the i2c-scmi part is in Jean's tree, but I still need this
> second patch to the ACPI code itself. Did you pick it up, or should I resend?
I'm a little confused as to where we left things. Can you repost
the current series in a new thread? It looks like there might be
places that use "SMBUSIBM" when they should use ACPI_SMBUS_IBM_HID.
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-04 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-20 23:11 [PATCH] i2c-scmi: Quirk to work on IBM machines with broken BIOSes Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-21 2:30 ` Crane Cai
2009-10-21 14:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-10-21 17:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-22 7:17 ` Crane Cai
2009-10-22 17:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-22 18:37 ` Jean Delvare
2009-10-23 4:44 ` Crane Cai
2009-10-23 17:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] i2c-scmi: support IBM SMBus CMI devices Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-25 9:39 ` Jean Delvare
2009-10-26 2:54 ` Crane Cai
2009-10-23 17:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] acpi: " Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-25 11:53 ` Jean Delvare
2009-10-26 20:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-26 20:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-27 17:03 ` Jean Delvare
2009-10-27 17:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-27 17:36 ` Jean Delvare
2009-12-04 17:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-12-04 17:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2009-12-04 18:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-12-04 18:11 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 1/2] ACPI: Quirk to make SMBus objects work on IBM machines with broken BIOSes Darrick J. Wong
2009-12-17 14:02 ` Jean Delvare
2010-01-05 12:30 ` Jean Delvare
2009-12-04 18:13 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 2/2] i2c-scmi: support IBM SMBus CMI devices Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-26 21:00 ` [PATCH " Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-27 17:24 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200912041036.36686.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--to=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=crane.cai@amd.com \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®