mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	stable@kernel.org, Rickard Bellini <rickard.bellini@ericsson.com>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	Torgny Johansson <torgny.johansson@ericsson.com>,
	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Driver core: fix race in dev_driver_string
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 20:55:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200912042055.55565.oliver@neukum.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091204165040.GB2180@suse.de>

Am Freitag, 4. Dezember 2009 17:50:40 schrieb Greg KH:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 05:16:19PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 4. Dezember 2009 17:06:57 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > Oliver:
> > > 
> > > We don't have to worry about the device structure being deallocated 
> > > while the routine is running.  If that happens it's a bug in the 
> > > caller: improper refcounting.
> >
> > 
> > That raises two points
> > 
> > 1. am I supposed to get a reference just so that I can use dev_err?
> 
> No, you should already have a reference on the device when doing the
> call, right?

No, why? Consider this:

int write(...)
{
	...
	mutex_lock(&instance->lock);
	if (instance->disconnected) {
		dev_dbg(instance->dev,"writing to disconnected device"); 
		rv = -ENODEV;
	} else {
		res = usb_submit_urb(...);
		rv = res < 0 ? -EIO : count;
	}
	mutex_unlock(&instance->lock);
	return rv;
}

void disconnect(...)
{
	...
	mutex_lock(&instance->lock);
	instance->disconnected = 1;
	usb_kill_urb(...);
	usb_kill_urb(...);
	mutex_unlock(&instance->lock);
}

This would be perfectly valid code without any references taken save
for the pesky dev_dbg()

	Regards
		Oliver

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-04 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20091204044337.GE14819@suse.de>
2009-12-04 16:06 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-04 16:16   ` Oliver Neukum
2009-12-04 16:50     ` Greg KH
2009-12-04 19:55       ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2009-12-04 20:57         ` Alan Stern
2009-12-04 21:18           ` Oliver Neukum
2009-12-04 21:36             ` Alan Stern
2009-12-04 21:58               ` Oliver Neukum
2009-12-04 22:07                 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-04 22:23                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-12-04 23:50                     ` Alan Stern
2009-12-05  0:35                       ` Greg KH
2009-12-05  2:37                         ` Alan Stern
2009-12-05  0:33                 ` Greg KH
2009-12-04 16:57     ` Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200912042055.55565.oliver@neukum.org \
    --to=oliver@neukum.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rickard.bellini@ericsson.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=torgny.johansson@ericsson.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®