From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
stable@kernel.org, Rickard Bellini <rickard.bellini@ericsson.com>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
Torgny Johansson <torgny.johansson@ericsson.com>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Driver core: fix race in dev_driver_string
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 20:55:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200912042055.55565.oliver@neukum.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091204165040.GB2180@suse.de>
Am Freitag, 4. Dezember 2009 17:50:40 schrieb Greg KH:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 05:16:19PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 4. Dezember 2009 17:06:57 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > Oliver:
> > >
> > > We don't have to worry about the device structure being deallocated
> > > while the routine is running. If that happens it's a bug in the
> > > caller: improper refcounting.
> >
> >
> > That raises two points
> >
> > 1. am I supposed to get a reference just so that I can use dev_err?
>
> No, you should already have a reference on the device when doing the
> call, right?
No, why? Consider this:
int write(...)
{
...
mutex_lock(&instance->lock);
if (instance->disconnected) {
dev_dbg(instance->dev,"writing to disconnected device");
rv = -ENODEV;
} else {
res = usb_submit_urb(...);
rv = res < 0 ? -EIO : count;
}
mutex_unlock(&instance->lock);
return rv;
}
void disconnect(...)
{
...
mutex_lock(&instance->lock);
instance->disconnected = 1;
usb_kill_urb(...);
usb_kill_urb(...);
mutex_unlock(&instance->lock);
}
This would be perfectly valid code without any references taken save
for the pesky dev_dbg()
Regards
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-04 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20091204044337.GE14819@suse.de>
2009-12-04 16:06 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-04 16:16 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-12-04 16:50 ` Greg KH
2009-12-04 19:55 ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2009-12-04 20:57 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-04 21:18 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-12-04 21:36 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-04 21:58 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-12-04 22:07 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-04 22:23 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-12-04 23:50 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-05 0:35 ` Greg KH
2009-12-05 2:37 ` Alan Stern
2009-12-05 0:33 ` Greg KH
2009-12-04 16:57 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200912042055.55565.oliver@neukum.org \
--to=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rickard.bellini@ericsson.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=torgny.johansson@ericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®