From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [patch 22/23] perf_event: Convert to raw_spinlock
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 18:03:50 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091206111958.146106628@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091206110944.492100233@linutronix.de>
[-- Attachment #1: perf-convert-to-core-lock.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 12712 bytes --]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 2
kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 4 -
kernel/perf_event.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6-tip/include/linux/perf_event.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-tip.orig/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ linux-2.6-tip/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ struct perf_event_context {
* Protect the states of the events in the list,
* nr_active, and the list:
*/
- spinlock_t lock;
+ raw_spinlock_t lock;
/*
* Protect the list of events. Locking either mutex or lock
* is sufficient to ensure the list doesn't change; to change
Index: linux-2.6-tip/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-tip.orig/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ linux-2.6-tip/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static void toggle_bp_task_slot(struct t
list = &ctx->event_list;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, flags);
/*
* The current breakpoint counter is not included in the list
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static void toggle_bp_task_slot(struct t
count++;
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
if (WARN_ONCE(count < 0, "No breakpoint counter found in the counter list"))
return;
Index: linux-2.6-tip/kernel/perf_event.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-tip.orig/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ linux-2.6-tip/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -203,14 +203,14 @@ perf_lock_task_context(struct task_struc
* if so. If we locked the right context, then it
* can't get swapped on us any more.
*/
- spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, *flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, *flags);
if (ctx != rcu_dereference(task->perf_event_ctxp)) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, *flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, *flags);
goto retry;
}
if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&ctx->refcount)) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, *flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, *flags);
ctx = NULL;
}
}
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static struct perf_event_context *perf_p
ctx = perf_lock_task_context(task, &flags);
if (ctx) {
++ctx->pin_count;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
}
return ctx;
}
@@ -240,9 +240,9 @@ static void perf_unpin_context(struct pe
{
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, flags);
--ctx->pin_count;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
put_ctx(ctx);
}
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ static void __perf_event_remove_from_con
if (ctx->task && cpuctx->task_ctx != ctx)
return;
- spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
/*
* Protect the list operation against NMI by disabling the
* events on a global level.
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static void __perf_event_remove_from_con
}
perf_enable();
- spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
}
@@ -488,12 +488,12 @@ retry:
task_oncpu_function_call(task, __perf_event_remove_from_context,
event);
- spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
/*
* If the context is active we need to retry the smp call.
*/
if (ctx->nr_active && !list_empty(&event->group_entry)) {
- spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
goto retry;
}
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ retry:
*/
if (!list_empty(&event->group_entry))
list_del_event(event, ctx);
- spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
}
/*
@@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ static void __perf_event_disable(void *i
if (ctx->task && cpuctx->task_ctx != ctx)
return;
- spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
/*
* If the event is on, turn it off.
@@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ static void __perf_event_disable(void *i
event->state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF;
}
- spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
}
/*
@@ -584,12 +584,12 @@ static void perf_event_disable(struct pe
retry:
task_oncpu_function_call(task, __perf_event_disable, event);
- spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
/*
* If the event is still active, we need to retry the cross-call.
*/
if (event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE) {
- spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
goto retry;
}
@@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ static void perf_event_disable(struct pe
event->state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF;
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
}
static int
@@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ static void __perf_install_in_context(vo
cpuctx->task_ctx = ctx;
}
- spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
ctx->is_active = 1;
update_context_time(ctx);
@@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ static void __perf_install_in_context(vo
unlock:
perf_enable();
- spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
}
/*
@@ -856,12 +856,12 @@ retry:
task_oncpu_function_call(task, __perf_install_in_context,
event);
- spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
/*
* we need to retry the smp call.
*/
if (ctx->is_active && list_empty(&event->group_entry)) {
- spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
goto retry;
}
@@ -872,7 +872,7 @@ retry:
*/
if (list_empty(&event->group_entry))
add_event_to_ctx(event, ctx);
- spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
}
/*
@@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ static void __perf_event_enable(void *in
cpuctx->task_ctx = ctx;
}
- spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
ctx->is_active = 1;
update_context_time(ctx);
@@ -959,7 +959,7 @@ static void __perf_event_enable(void *in
}
unlock:
- spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
}
/*
@@ -985,7 +985,7 @@ static void perf_event_enable(struct per
return;
}
- spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
if (event->state >= PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE)
goto out;
@@ -1000,10 +1000,10 @@ static void perf_event_enable(struct per
event->state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF;
retry:
- spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
task_oncpu_function_call(task, __perf_event_enable, event);
- spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
/*
* If the context is active and the event is still off,
@@ -1020,7 +1020,7 @@ static void perf_event_enable(struct per
__perf_event_mark_enabled(event, ctx);
out:
- spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
}
static int perf_event_refresh(struct perf_event *event, int refresh)
@@ -1042,7 +1042,7 @@ void __perf_event_sched_out(struct perf_
{
struct perf_event *event;
- spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
ctx->is_active = 0;
if (likely(!ctx->nr_events))
goto out;
@@ -1055,7 +1055,7 @@ void __perf_event_sched_out(struct perf_
}
perf_enable();
out:
- spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
}
/*
@@ -1193,8 +1193,8 @@ void perf_event_task_sched_out(struct ta
* order we take the locks because no other cpu could
* be trying to lock both of these tasks.
*/
- spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
- spin_lock_nested(&next_ctx->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+ raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_nested(&next_ctx->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
if (context_equiv(ctx, next_ctx)) {
/*
* XXX do we need a memory barrier of sorts
@@ -1208,8 +1208,8 @@ void perf_event_task_sched_out(struct ta
perf_event_sync_stat(ctx, next_ctx);
}
- spin_unlock(&next_ctx->lock);
- spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&next_ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -1251,7 +1251,7 @@ __perf_event_sched_in(struct perf_event_
struct perf_event *event;
int can_add_hw = 1;
- spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
ctx->is_active = 1;
if (likely(!ctx->nr_events))
goto out;
@@ -1306,7 +1306,7 @@ __perf_event_sched_in(struct perf_event_
}
perf_enable();
out:
- spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
}
/*
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ static void perf_ctx_adjust_freq(struct
struct hw_perf_event *hwc;
u64 interrupts, freq;
- spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
list_for_each_entry_rcu(event, &ctx->event_list, event_entry) {
if (event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
continue;
@@ -1425,7 +1425,7 @@ static void perf_ctx_adjust_freq(struct
perf_enable();
}
}
- spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
}
/*
@@ -1438,7 +1438,7 @@ static void rotate_ctx(struct perf_event
if (!ctx->nr_events)
return;
- spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
/*
* Rotate the first entry last (works just fine for group events too):
*/
@@ -1449,7 +1449,7 @@ static void rotate_ctx(struct perf_event
}
perf_enable();
- spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
}
void perf_event_task_tick(struct task_struct *curr, int cpu)
@@ -1498,7 +1498,7 @@ static void perf_event_enable_on_exec(st
__perf_event_task_sched_out(ctx);
- spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
list_for_each_entry(event, &ctx->group_list, group_entry) {
if (!event->attr.enable_on_exec)
@@ -1516,7 +1516,7 @@ static void perf_event_enable_on_exec(st
if (enabled)
unclone_ctx(ctx);
- spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
perf_event_task_sched_in(task, smp_processor_id());
out:
@@ -1542,10 +1542,10 @@ static void __perf_event_read(void *info
if (ctx->task && cpuctx->task_ctx != ctx)
return;
- spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
update_context_time(ctx);
update_event_times(event);
- spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
event->pmu->read(event);
}
@@ -1563,10 +1563,10 @@ static u64 perf_event_read(struct perf_e
struct perf_event_context *ctx = event->ctx;
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, flags);
update_context_time(ctx);
update_event_times(event);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
}
return atomic64_read(&event->count);
@@ -1580,7 +1580,7 @@ __perf_event_init_context(struct perf_ev
struct task_struct *task)
{
memset(ctx, 0, sizeof(*ctx));
- spin_lock_init(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_init(&ctx->lock);
mutex_init(&ctx->mutex);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->group_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->event_list);
@@ -1650,7 +1650,7 @@ static struct perf_event_context *find_g
ctx = perf_lock_task_context(task, &flags);
if (ctx) {
unclone_ctx(ctx);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
}
if (!ctx) {
@@ -1988,7 +1988,7 @@ static int perf_event_period(struct perf
if (!value)
return -EINVAL;
- spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
if (event->attr.freq) {
if (value > sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate) {
ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -2001,7 +2001,7 @@ static int perf_event_period(struct perf
event->hw.sample_period = value;
}
unlock:
- spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
return ret;
}
@@ -4998,7 +4998,7 @@ void perf_event_exit_task(struct task_st
* reading child->perf_event_ctxp, we wait until it has
* incremented the context's refcount before we do put_ctx below.
*/
- spin_lock(&child_ctx->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&child_ctx->lock);
child->perf_event_ctxp = NULL;
/*
* If this context is a clone; unclone it so it can't get
@@ -5007,7 +5007,7 @@ void perf_event_exit_task(struct task_st
*/
unclone_ctx(child_ctx);
update_context_time(child_ctx);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&child_ctx->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&child_ctx->lock, flags);
/*
* Report the task dead after unscheduling the events so that we
@@ -5291,11 +5291,11 @@ perf_set_reserve_percpu(struct sysdev_cl
perf_reserved_percpu = val;
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
cpuctx = &per_cpu(perf_cpu_context, cpu);
- spin_lock_irq(&cpuctx->ctx.lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&cpuctx->ctx.lock);
mpt = min(perf_max_events - cpuctx->ctx.nr_events,
perf_max_events - perf_reserved_percpu);
cpuctx->max_pertask = mpt;
- spin_unlock_irq(&cpuctx->ctx.lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&cpuctx->ctx.lock);
}
spin_unlock(&perf_resource_lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-06 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-06 18:01 [patch 00/23] locking: name space cleanup and -rt spinlock annotation Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-06 18:01 ` [patch 01/23] locking: Reorder functions in spinlock.c Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-06 18:01 ` [patch 02/23] locking: Split rwlock from spinlock headers Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-07 17:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-12-06 18:02 ` [patch 03/23] locking: Separate rwlock api from spinlock api Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-06 18:02 ` [patch 04/23] locking: Convert raw_spinlock to arch_spinlock Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-06 18:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-06 18:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-06 18:02 ` [patch 05/23] locking: Rename __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED to __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-06 18:02 ` [patch 06/23] locking: Convert __raw_spin* functions to arch_spin* Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-06 18:02 ` [patch 07/23] locking: Convert raw_rwlock to arch_rwlock Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-06 18:02 ` [patch 08/23] locking: Convert raw_rwlock functions " Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-06 18:02 ` [patch 09/23] locking: Implement new raw_spinlock Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-08 13:33 ` Yong Zhang
2009-12-06 18:02 ` [patch 10/23] locking: Further name space cleanups Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-06 18:02 ` [patch 11/23] locking: Cleanup the name space completely Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-06 18:02 ` [patch 12/23] bkl: Fixup core_lock fallout Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-06 18:02 ` [patch 13/23] plist: Make plist debugging raw_spinlock aware Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-07 1:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 18:03 ` [patch 14/23] sched: Convert rq->lock to raw_spinlock Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-06 18:03 ` [patch 15/23] sched: Convert rt_runtime_lock " Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-06 18:03 ` [patch 16/23] sched: Convert cpupri lock " Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-06 18:03 ` [patch 17/23] sched: Convert pi_lock " Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-06 18:03 ` [patch 18/23] rtmutes: Convert rtmutex.lock " Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-06 18:03 ` [patch 19/23] smp: Convert smplocks to raw_spinlocks Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-06 18:03 ` [patch 20/23] genirq: Convert irq_desc.lock to raw_spinlock Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-06 18:03 ` [patch 21/23] hrtimers: Convert to raw_spinlocks Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-06 18:03 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2009-12-06 18:03 ` [patch 23/23] debugobjects: " Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091206111958.146106628@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®