From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934141AbZLFSUG (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Dec 2009 13:20:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934064AbZLFSUD (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Dec 2009 13:20:03 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:45605 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934035AbZLFSUC (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Dec 2009 13:20:02 -0500 Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 19:19:54 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Thomas Gleixner , LKML , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Linux-Arch Subject: Re: [patch 04/23] locking: Convert raw_spinlock to arch_spinlock Message-ID: <20091206181954.GA11753@elte.hu> References: <20091206110944.492100233@linutronix.de> <20091206111957.454670287@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Linus Torvalds wrote: > So I like it, but maybe the arch people hate it? I like it too - but i'm even more biased i guess ;-) Ingo