mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <ericxiao.gr@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	T??r??k Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf/sched: fix for getting task's execution time
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 08:30:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091207073043.GH10868@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B1CACC4.3030709@cn.fujitsu.com>


* Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> In current code, task's execute time is got by reading
> '/proc/<pid>/sched' file, it's wrong if the task is created
> by pthread_create(), because every thread task has same pid.
> 
> This way also has two demerits:
> 
> 1: 'perf sched replay' can't work if the kernel not compile with
>    'CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG' option
> 2: perf tool should depend on proc file system
> 
> So, this patch call getrusage() to get task's execution time instead
> of reading /proc file

ok, that's better than /proc, but how about using 
PERF_COUNT_SW_TASK_CLOCK instead of rusage, to recover the CPU time 
used? It would be more precise, and it would use the perf API. (Some 
helper functions in tools/perf/lib/ would be nice to make it as easy to 
use as rusage (or even easier if possible).)

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-07  7:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-06 10:57 [PATCH] perf/sched: fix for getting task's execute time Xiao Guangrong
2009-12-06 11:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-06 11:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-06 11:50     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-06 17:10     ` Xiao Guangrong
2009-12-07  7:20       ` [PATCH v2] perf/sched: fix for getting task's execution time Xiao Guangrong
2009-12-07  7:30         ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-12-09  9:51           ` [PATCH v3] " Xiao Guangrong
2009-12-09  9:54             ` Xiao Guangrong
2009-12-09  9:59               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-09  9:57             ` Xiao Guangrong
2009-12-09  9:57             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-09 10:03             ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf sched: Fix " tip-bot for Xiao Guangrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091207073043.GH10868@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=edwintorok@gmail.com \
    --cc=ericxiao.gr@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®