From: "Nikita V. Youshchenko" <yoush@cs.msu.su>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: When it is save to kfree() hrtimer object?
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 10:45:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200912071045.09827@blacky.localdomain> (raw)
Hi
I'm writing a device driver that processes it's requests.
Each request is described by a request structure. There may be arbitary
number of requests pending, so I have a kmem_cache for those objects.
Request processing may include "retry after N usecs" on some conditions, so
I have a struct htrimer embedded into my request structure, and use it to
implement the delay.
When request processing is complete, I deallocate request structure with
kmem_cache_free().
I faced an issue when request processing is complete when running inside
hrtimer callback. I have nothing in my request processing that can't be
done in atomic context - just several device register accesses and
wake_up_interruptible() call. So I thought that I may do everything inside
hrtimer callback. Including kmem_cache_free() the request structure.
But looks like I can't. Hrtimer code does access hrtimer object after
return from callback, even if HRTIMER_NORESTART is returned. So if request
object (that is container of hrtimer object in my case) is deallocated,
slab corruption happens.
Looks like I will have to implement some ugly workaround for that ... like
a "garbage-collector" thread that will do nothing but deallocate requests
from some sort of free list.
I'd like to ask several questions.
- Isn't it a bug that timer object is accessed after it's callback was
called and returned HRTIMER_NORESTART?
- If that is not a bug, then when it is "officially safe" to deallocate
struct hrtimer object?
- Are there any recommendations on how to implement "single-shot" timers
like in my case?
Nikita
next reply other threads:[~2009-12-07 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-07 7:45 Nikita V. Youshchenko [this message]
2009-12-07 10:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200912071045.09827@blacky.localdomain \
--to=yoush@cs.msu.su \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®