From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757462AbZLNOaX (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:30:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757448AbZLNOaW (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:30:22 -0500 Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:38181 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757440AbZLNOaU (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:30:20 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:30:00 -0500 From: tytso@mit.edu To: David Howells Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ext4: Don't ask about supporting ext2/3 in ext4 if ext4 is not configured Message-ID: <20091214143000.GA4867@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: tytso@mit.edu, David Howells , torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20091214135546.10111.4495.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091214135546.10111.4495.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 01:55:46PM +0000, David Howells wrote: > Don't offer to build ext2/3 support into ext4 if ext4 itself is not configured > on. > > Signed-off-by: David Howells Whoops, nice catch. Added to the ext4 patch queue, I'll make sure this gets pushed to Linus during the merge window. - Ted