From: Matthew Dharm <mdharm-kernel@one-eyed-alien.net>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Cc: Josua Dietze <digidietze@draisberghof.de>,
Stefan Seyfried <stefan.seyfried@googlemail.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net,
Stefan Seyfried <seife@sphairon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] move eject code from zd1211rw to usb-storage
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:03:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091216180337.GG16426@one-eyed-alien.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200912161129.27284.oliver@neukum.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1449 bytes --]
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:29:27AM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 15. Dezember 2009 19:03:00 schrieb Matthew Dharm:
> > > This would break existing systems and thus introduce a regression.
> > > We'd need to go through a feature removal process. For the time being
> > > I see no alternative to Seife's patch, as we cannot introduce ejection
> > > code to another wireless driver and need to support these devices.
> >
> > The right answer here is neither to move the eject code nor to introduce
> > more of it. New devices should be supported via userspace.
>
> Usually I would agree, but in this case the vendor reused IDs.
> The legacy kernel space switcher and user space would race.
So, let me see if I understand this... we have two devices that use the
same IDs, and get mode-switched the same way, but need different
post-switch drivers?
If this is the case, then the only reasonable answer to is to push the
modeswitch code for both into udev and out of the kernel. It will take
longer to support the new device that way (since we need to wait until udev
is updated and then remove kernel support), but that's what a vendor gets
for re-using IDs.
Matt
--
Matthew Dharm Home: mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net
Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver
What, are you one of those Microsoft-bashing Linux freaks?
-- Customer to Greg
User Friendly, 2/10/1999
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-16 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-15 12:06 Stefan Seyfried
2009-12-15 12:31 ` Josua Dietze
2009-12-15 14:01 ` Stefan Seyfried
2009-12-15 14:59 ` Josua Dietze
2009-12-15 17:58 ` [usb-storage] " Matthew Dharm
2009-12-15 15:11 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-12-15 18:03 ` Matthew Dharm
2009-12-16 10:29 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-12-16 11:42 ` Josua Dietze
2009-12-16 18:03 ` Matthew Dharm [this message]
2009-12-16 19:50 ` Dan Williams
2009-12-16 19:52 ` Matthew Dharm
2009-12-17 13:02 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-12-17 13:33 ` Josua Dietze
2009-12-17 14:36 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-12-17 15:22 ` Josua Dietze
2009-12-17 18:21 ` Matthew Dharm
2009-12-16 10:49 ` Stefan Seyfried
2009-12-16 11:22 ` Josua Dietze
2009-12-16 12:14 ` Stefan Seyfried
2009-12-16 14:05 ` John W. Linville
2009-12-16 16:47 ` Dan Williams
2009-12-16 19:12 ` Matthew Dharm
2009-12-16 11:23 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-12-17 10:41 ` [usb-storage] " Daniel Drake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091216180337.GG16426@one-eyed-alien.net \
--to=mdharm-kernel@one-eyed-alien.net \
--cc=digidietze@draisberghof.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=seife@sphairon.com \
--cc=stefan.seyfried@googlemail.com \
--cc=usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome