From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: keithp@keithp.com, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [BISECTED] drm: random hang since 620f378 "drm: prune modes when ..."
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:25:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091217092523.755ecf29@jbarnes-piketon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200912162241.27591.arnd@arndb.de>
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:41:27 +0000
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 December 2009 21:36:36 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 December 2009 21:30:05 Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > But you're sure powersave=0 was solid? Hmm...
> >
> > It's hard to be sure when it sometimes takes a day before a
> > broken version crashes. I can keep running this kernel with and
> > without powersave=0 some more and tell you if it stays reproducible.
>
> Now it has crashed with i915.powersave=0 plus your patch as well
> (latest 2.6.32 git), indicating that there is something else wrong
> with the original 652c393a33 patch.
It does very little else that should affect things. You're sure
reverting the commit makes things ok?
Other potential problems:
- clock gating (the call to intel_init_clock_gating)
- the actual mark_busy stuff itself (calls to intel_mark_busy)
- intel_idle_update (but powersave=0 should prevent that)
If you want to keep testing you could try removing those calls...
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-17 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-07 17:30 Arnd Bergmann
2009-12-08 21:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-12-08 22:13 ` Dave Airlie
2009-12-08 23:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-12-09 5:38 ` Dave Airlie
2009-12-13 12:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-12-13 12:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-12-13 20:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2009-12-13 21:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-12-13 21:54 ` Dave Airlie
2009-12-14 18:20 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-12-14 20:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-12-14 20:50 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-12-15 9:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-12-16 13:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-12-16 20:18 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-12-16 21:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-12-16 21:30 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-12-16 21:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-12-16 22:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-12-17 17:25 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2009-12-17 17:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-12-17 19:13 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-12-19 13:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-12-21 16:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-12-21 17:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-12-28 18:47 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-12-30 22:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-12-16 12:19 ` Mathieu Taillefumier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091217092523.755ecf29@jbarnes-piketon \
--to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=keithp@keithp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®