mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Blum <bblum@andrew.cmu.edu>
To: Dave Anderson <anderson@redhat.com>
Cc: menage@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroups: fix 2.6.32 regression causing BUG_ON() in cgroup_diput()
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 03:38:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091224083845.GA16162@andrew.cmu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B32660A.8070106@redhat.com>

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 01:48:42PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
> 
> The LTP cgroup test suite generates a "kernel BUG at kernel/cgroup.c:790!"
> here in cgroup_diput():
> 
>                 /*
>                  * if we're getting rid of the cgroup, refcount should 
>                  ensure
>                  * that there are no pidlists left.
>                  */
>                 BUG_ON(!list_empty(&cgrp->pidlists));
> 
> The cgroup pidlist rework in 2.6.32 generates the BUG_ON, which is caused
> when pidlist_array_load() calls cgroup_pidlist_find():
> 
> (1) if a matching cgroup_pidlist is found, it down_write's the mutex of the
>     pre-existing cgroup_pidlist, and increments its use_count.
> (2) if no matching cgroup_pidlist is found, then a new one is allocated, it
>     down_write's its mutex, and the use_count is set to 0.
> (3) the matching, or new, cgroup_pidlist gets returned back to 
> pidlist_array_load(),
>     which increments its use_count -- regardless whether new or 
>     pre-existing --
>     and up_write's the mutex.
> 
> So if a matching list is ever encountered by cgroup_pidlist_find() during
> the life of a cgroup directory, it results in an inflated use_count value,
> preventing it from ever getting released by cgroup_release_pid_array().
> Then if the directory is subsequently removed, cgroup_diput() hits the
> BUG_ON() when it finds that the directory's cgroup is still populated
> with a pidlist.
> 
> The patch simply removes the use_count increment when a matching
> pidlist is found by cgroup_pidlist_find(), because it gets bumped by
> the calling pidlist_array_load() function while still protected by the
> list's mutex.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Anderson <anderson@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> 

Ack! That was probably my fault. Good catch.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-12-24  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-23 18:48 Dave Anderson
2009-12-24  5:47 ` Li Zefan
2009-12-24  8:38 ` Ben Blum [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091224083845.GA16162@andrew.cmu.edu \
    --to=bblum@andrew.cmu.edu \
    --cc=anderson@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®