mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>, linux-kbuild@vger.kerne.org
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sections mismatch detection
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 15:03:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100107150339.b66fadc5.rdunlap@xenotime.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B44762C.1090605@suse.cz>

On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:38:20 +0100 Michal Marek wrote:

> On 6.1.2010 11:48, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 12:11:23PM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I wonder is it good time to enable DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH by default
> >> now? I mean, remove the following from lib/Kconfig.debug:
> >>
> >> config DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
> >>         bool "Enable full Section mismatch analysis"
> >>         depends on UNDEFINED
> >>         # This option is on purpose disabled for now.
> >>         # It will be enabled when we are down to a resonable number
> >>         # of section mismatch warnings (< 10 for an allyesconfig build)
> >>
> >> Just spotted this, and decided to remind.
> > 
> > My original criteria for enabling this was that we had a warnign free build
> > for all*config on x86 and a few other architectures.
> > While focusing on this I never reached this goal as I usually ended
> > up with some problems related to CPU hotplug.
> > I dunno how close we are today at the "zero warning" target.
> >
> ...
> > 
> > But I can see a steady flow of section mismatch fixes so I think the
> > situation looks better these days.
> 
> There is also steady flow of new code ;-). FWIW, a 2.6.32.2 x86 distro
> build shows 29 section mismatch warnings, 12 of these come from
> drivers/staging, the remaining are (duplicates removed):
> 
> WARNING: drivers/pci/built-in.o(.text+0x10a12): Section mismatch in
> reference from the function dmar_ir_support() to the variable
> .init.data:dmar_tbl
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.devinit.text+0x3aa2): Section mismatch in reference
> from the function ezx_pcap_probe() to the function
> .init.text:set_irq_noprobe()
> WARNING: drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.o(.data+0x44): Section
> mismatch in reference from the variable virtio_rng to the function
> .devexit.text:virtrng_remove()
> WARNING: drivers/scsi/hpsa.o(.text+0x192c): Section mismatch in
> reference from the function hpsa_pci_init() to the function
> .devinit.text:hpsa_interrupt_mode()
> WARNING: drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.o(.data+0x44): Section mismatch
> in reference from the variable virtio_balloon to the function
> .devexit.text:virtballoon_remove()
> 
> I'll try a current mainline build with DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y to see
> if/how this changed.

I would prefer to see (logically) the same section mismatch not be
reported multiple times, even though they are in different binary
files.  This would reduce the noise level quite a bit IMO.

E.g., I see this:

WARNING: drivers/scsi/hpsa.o(.text+0x1bd1): Section mismatch in reference from the function hpsa_pci_init() to the function .devinit.text:hpsa_interrupt_mode()
The function hpsa_pci_init() references
the function __devinit hpsa_interrupt_mode().
This is often because hpsa_pci_init lacks a __devinit 
annotation or the annotation of hpsa_interrupt_mode is wrong.

... followed later by ...

WARNING: drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x28e734): Section mismatch in reference from the function hpsa_pci_init() to the function .devinit.text:hpsa_interrupt_mode()
The function hpsa_pci_init() references
the function __devinit hpsa_interrupt_mode().
This is often because hpsa_pci_init lacks a __devinit 
annotation or the annotation of hpsa_interrupt_mode is wrong.

... followed later by ...

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x5b5cc4): Section mismatch in reference from the function hpsa_pci_init() to the function .devinit.text:hpsa_interrupt_mode()
The function hpsa_pci_init() references
the function __devinit hpsa_interrupt_mode().
This is often because hpsa_pci_init lacks a __devinit 
annotation or the annotation of hpsa_interrupt_mode is wrong.


One of these (preferably the first one) is enough for me.

---
~Randy

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-01-07 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-06 10:11 Artem Bityutskiy
2010-01-06 10:48 ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-01-06 11:38   ` Michal Marek
2010-01-06 12:04     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-01-07 23:03     ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2010-01-08  5:42       ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-01-08 13:18         ` Michal Marek
2010-01-08 16:27           ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-01-08 16:32             ` Michal Marek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100107150339.b66fadc5.rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --to=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kerne.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®