From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>, linux-kbuild@vger.kerne.org
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sections mismatch detection
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 15:03:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100107150339.b66fadc5.rdunlap@xenotime.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B44762C.1090605@suse.cz>
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:38:20 +0100 Michal Marek wrote:
> On 6.1.2010 11:48, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 12:11:23PM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I wonder is it good time to enable DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH by default
> >> now? I mean, remove the following from lib/Kconfig.debug:
> >>
> >> config DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
> >> bool "Enable full Section mismatch analysis"
> >> depends on UNDEFINED
> >> # This option is on purpose disabled for now.
> >> # It will be enabled when we are down to a resonable number
> >> # of section mismatch warnings (< 10 for an allyesconfig build)
> >>
> >> Just spotted this, and decided to remind.
> >
> > My original criteria for enabling this was that we had a warnign free build
> > for all*config on x86 and a few other architectures.
> > While focusing on this I never reached this goal as I usually ended
> > up with some problems related to CPU hotplug.
> > I dunno how close we are today at the "zero warning" target.
> >
> ...
> >
> > But I can see a steady flow of section mismatch fixes so I think the
> > situation looks better these days.
>
> There is also steady flow of new code ;-). FWIW, a 2.6.32.2 x86 distro
> build shows 29 section mismatch warnings, 12 of these come from
> drivers/staging, the remaining are (duplicates removed):
>
> WARNING: drivers/pci/built-in.o(.text+0x10a12): Section mismatch in
> reference from the function dmar_ir_support() to the variable
> .init.data:dmar_tbl
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.devinit.text+0x3aa2): Section mismatch in reference
> from the function ezx_pcap_probe() to the function
> .init.text:set_irq_noprobe()
> WARNING: drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.o(.data+0x44): Section
> mismatch in reference from the variable virtio_rng to the function
> .devexit.text:virtrng_remove()
> WARNING: drivers/scsi/hpsa.o(.text+0x192c): Section mismatch in
> reference from the function hpsa_pci_init() to the function
> .devinit.text:hpsa_interrupt_mode()
> WARNING: drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.o(.data+0x44): Section mismatch
> in reference from the variable virtio_balloon to the function
> .devexit.text:virtballoon_remove()
>
> I'll try a current mainline build with DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y to see
> if/how this changed.
I would prefer to see (logically) the same section mismatch not be
reported multiple times, even though they are in different binary
files. This would reduce the noise level quite a bit IMO.
E.g., I see this:
WARNING: drivers/scsi/hpsa.o(.text+0x1bd1): Section mismatch in reference from the function hpsa_pci_init() to the function .devinit.text:hpsa_interrupt_mode()
The function hpsa_pci_init() references
the function __devinit hpsa_interrupt_mode().
This is often because hpsa_pci_init lacks a __devinit
annotation or the annotation of hpsa_interrupt_mode is wrong.
... followed later by ...
WARNING: drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x28e734): Section mismatch in reference from the function hpsa_pci_init() to the function .devinit.text:hpsa_interrupt_mode()
The function hpsa_pci_init() references
the function __devinit hpsa_interrupt_mode().
This is often because hpsa_pci_init lacks a __devinit
annotation or the annotation of hpsa_interrupt_mode is wrong.
... followed later by ...
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x5b5cc4): Section mismatch in reference from the function hpsa_pci_init() to the function .devinit.text:hpsa_interrupt_mode()
The function hpsa_pci_init() references
the function __devinit hpsa_interrupt_mode().
This is often because hpsa_pci_init lacks a __devinit
annotation or the annotation of hpsa_interrupt_mode is wrong.
One of these (preferably the first one) is enough for me.
---
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-07 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-06 10:11 Artem Bityutskiy
2010-01-06 10:48 ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-01-06 11:38 ` Michal Marek
2010-01-06 12:04 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-01-07 23:03 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2010-01-08 5:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-01-08 13:18 ` Michal Marek
2010-01-08 16:27 ` Sam Ravnborg
2010-01-08 16:32 ` Michal Marek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100107150339.b66fadc5.rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--to=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kerne.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®