From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mips,mm: Reinstate move_pte optimization
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 15:32:57 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100107151527.8784.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0912301437420.3369@sister.anvils>
CC to mips folks.
> If something like this or your replacment does go forward,
> then I think that test is better inside the "if (!page->mapping)"
> below. Admittedly that adds even more mm-dependence here (relying
> on a zero page to have NULL page->mapping); but isn't page_to_pfn()
> one of those functions which is trivial on many configs but expensive
> on some? Better call it only in the rare case that it's needed.
>
> Though wouldn't it be even better not to use is_zero_pfn() at all?
> That was convenient in mm/memory.c because it had the pfn or pte right
> at hand, but here a traditional (page == ZERO_PAGE(address)) would be
> more efficient.
>
> Which would save having to move is_zero_pfn() from mm/memory.c
> to include/linux/mm.h - I'd prefer to keep it private if we can.
> But for completeness, this would involve resurrecting the 2.6.19
> MIPS move_pte(), which makes sure mremap() move doesn't interfere
> with our assumptions. Something like
>
> #define __HAVE_ARCH_MOVE_PTE
> pte_t move_pte(pte_t pte, pgprot_t prot, unsigned long old_addr,
> unsigned long new_addr)
> {
> if (pte_present(pte) && is_zero_pfn(pte_pfn(pte)))
> pte = mk_pte(ZERO_PAGE(new_addr), prot);
> return pte;
> }
>
> in arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h.
I agree with resurrecting mips move_pte. At least your patch
passed my cross compile test :)
Ralf, can you please review following patch?
======================================================
Subject: [PATCH] mips,mm: Reinstate move_pte optimization
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>
About three years ago, we removed mips specific move_pte by commit
701dfbc1cb (mm: mremap correct rmap accounting). because it is only
small optimization and it has bug.
However new zero-page thing doesn't have such problem and behavior
consistency of mremap have worth a bit.
This patch reinstate it.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h | 8 ++++++++
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 1854336..6ad2f73 100644
--- a/arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -387,6 +387,14 @@ static inline int io_remap_pfn_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
remap_pfn_range(vma, vaddr, pfn, size, prot)
#endif
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_MOVE_PTE
+pte_t move_pte(pte_t pte, pgprot_t prot, unsigned long old_addr, unsigned long new_addr)
+{
+ if (pte_present(pte) && is_zero_pfn(pte_pfn(pte)))
+ pte = mk_pte(ZERO_PAGE(new_addr), prot);
+ return pte;
+}
+
#include <asm-generic/pgtable.h>
/*
--
1.6.5.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-07 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-24 9:29 [PATCH] futex: Fix ZERO_PAGE cause infinite loop KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-24 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-24 17:15 ` Ulrich Drepper
2009-12-25 1:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-30 16:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2010-01-05 7:32 ` [PATCH v2] futex: remove rw parameter from get_futex_key() KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-05 11:21 ` Hugh Dickins
2010-01-05 20:41 ` Darren Hart
2010-01-06 2:27 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-06 23:14 ` Darren Hart
2010-01-06 23:29 ` Darren Hart
2010-01-13 10:30 ` [tip:core/urgent] futexes: Remove " tip-bot for KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-07 6:32 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2010-01-11 10:15 ` [PATCH] mips,mm: Reinstate move_pte optimization Ralf Baechle
2010-01-05 18:04 ` [PATCH] futex: Fix ZERO_PAGE cause infinite loop Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100107151527.8784.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
--cc=drepper@gmail.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®