From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753193Ab0AKQtj (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:49:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753140Ab0AKQti (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:49:38 -0500 Received: from outbound-mail-07.bluehost.com ([69.89.17.207]:44130 "HELO outbound-mail-07.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753054Ab0AKQth (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:49:37 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=sRg/OhhcIwt8RUGinQWqPeRE5DmiPnaCzMtUZWfCSHrv7rycvSg0zMloLVeT/mv+qhKhmqQityHqRLP0vrG+r+sJjkbZ+tjDxOdcedCRBx0DKE9rnCC3JBLsGWhI7E/0; Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:49:42 -0800 From: Jesse Barnes To: Simon Horman Cc: Marin Mitov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [BUG?]Section mismatch dmar_ir_support() Message-ID: <20100111084942.29900ef5@jbarnes-piketon> In-Reply-To: <20100111132022.GC5198@verge.net.au> References: <201001082127.22685.mitov@issp.bas.bg> <20100111132022.GC5198@verge.net.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.18.3; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {10642:box514.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.111.28.251 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:20:22 +1100 Simon Horman wrote: > [ PCI list and maintainer CC added ] > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 09:27:22PM +0200, Marin Mitov wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Please, look at how many times the same patch is proposed, > > but still not fixed:-) > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/3/3 > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/13/271 > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/4/462 > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/16/424 > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/20/21 > > > > Sure I could be missing some other postings :-) > > > > Who could take care of it? And should we? > > I've been wondering about that too. > The patch seems correct to me. Oh I was thinking David would pick it up. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center