From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753496Ab0AKNGf (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:06:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753481Ab0AKNGe (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:06:34 -0500 Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]:60577 "EHLO kirsty.vergenet.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753480Ab0AKNGd (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:06:33 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:06:31 +1100 From: Simon Horman To: Dan Carpenter , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Peter Huewe Subject: Re: [patch 6/6] otus: zfRateCtrlRateDiff(): remove duplicate comparison Message-ID: <20100111130631.GB5198@verge.net.au> References: <20100108075748.059645106@vergenet.net> <20100108075921.504899210@vergenet.net> <20100109084438.GD7840@bicker> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100109084438.GD7840@bicker> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 11:44:38AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 06:57:54PM +1100, horms@vergenet.net wrote: > > I think this is correct. > > > > $ gcc (Debian 4.4.2-8) 4.4.2 > > Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO > > warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. > > > > $ make > > ... > > drivers/staging/otus/80211core/ratectrl.c: In function > > 'zfRateCtrlRateDiff': > > drivers/staging/otus/80211core/ratectrl.c:433: warning: suggest parentheses > > around comparison in operand of '==' > > ... > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman > > > > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/staging/otus/80211core/ratectrl.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/staging/otus/80211core/ratectrl.c 2010-01-08 17:13:44.000000000 +1100 > > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/staging/otus/80211core/ratectrl.c 2010-01-08 17:14:02.000000000 +1100 > > @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ u8_t zfRateCtrlRateDiff(struct zsRcCell* > > { > > return ((rcCell->currentRateIndex - i)+1)>>1; > > } > > - else if (i == rcCell->currentRateIndex == 0) > > + else if (i == rcCell->currentRateIndex) > > You realize you have reversed the meaning of the test? The original > was the same as if (i != rcCell->currentRateIndex). > > Your patch is possibly correct, but it's hard to know. I would > leave this for now until someone grovels through the code to find > out for sure if it should be == or !=. If we silence the warning, > no one will ever look at this code again. Good point, I withdraw this patch.