From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@googlemail.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysfs: Add lockdep annotations for the sysfs active reference
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:03:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100117180351.GA17688@isilmar.linta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1eilo7iqd.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Hey,
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 09:18:34AM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:37:12 -0800
> > ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Holding locks over device_del -> kobject_del -> sysfs_deactivate can
> >> cause deadlocks if those same locks are grabbed in sysfs show or store
> >> methods.
> >>
> >> The I model s_active count + completion as a sleeping read/write lock.
> >> I describe to lockdep sysfs_get_active as a read_trylock,
> >> sysfs_put_active as a read_unlock, and sysfs_deactivate as a
> >> write_lock and write_unlock pair. This seems to capture the essence
> >> for purposes of finding deadlocks, and in my testing gives finds real
> >> issues and ignores non-issues.
> >>
> >> This brings us back to holding locks over kobject_del is a problem
> >> that ideally we should find a way of addressing, but at least lockdep
> >> can tell us about the problems instead of requiring developers to
> >> debug rare strange system deadlocks, that happen when sysfs files are
> >> removed while being written to.
> >
> > The model has hit a possible deadlock in pcmcia, and the lockdep warning
> > comes when I unplug my wlan card from pcmcia slot.
> >
> > Looks like socket->skt_mutex is held in remove path, and it is also
> > grabbed in .stor method.
>
>
> Looking a little closer this is simultaneously a legitimate problem
> and also a false positive.
>
> This is only legitimate if you add/remove a cardbus bridge, plugged into
> another cardbus bridge, which I think is unlikely but physically possible.
Unfortunately, it is not a false positive, as removing a PCMCIA device
racing with "pccardctl eject" seems to trigger this path as well. Patch is
being prepared...
Best,
Dominik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-17 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-24 22:00 Linux 2.6.33-rc2 - Merry Christmas Linus Torvalds
2009-12-25 10:27 ` -tip: origin tree boot crash Ingo Molnar
2009-12-25 19:49 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-12-26 20:19 ` Len Brown
2009-12-26 20:17 ` Len Brown
2009-12-27 4:20 ` Len Brown
2009-12-28 9:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-28 12:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-28 15:02 ` Paul Rolland
2009-12-28 16:15 ` Paul Rolland
2009-12-28 16:53 ` Paul Rolland
2009-12-28 20:17 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-12-30 6:14 ` Len Brown
2009-12-30 7:13 ` Paul Rolland
2009-12-30 6:19 ` [PATCH] wmi: check find_guid() return value to prevent oops Len Brown
2009-12-30 6:21 ` [PATCH] dell-wmi: sys_init_module: 'dell_wmi'->init suspiciously returned 21, it should follow 0/-E convention Len Brown
2009-12-25 13:10 ` Linux 2.6.33-rc2 - Blank screen for Intel KMS Miguel Calleja
2009-12-29 9:50 ` Miguel Calleja
2009-12-29 14:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-25 20:00 ` Linux 2.6.33-rc2 - Merry Christmas Borislav Petkov
2009-12-25 21:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-12-26 6:00 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-12-26 8:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-12-26 9:36 ` EHCI resume sysfs duplicates (was: Re: Linux 2.6.33-rc2 - Merry Christmas ...) Borislav Petkov
2009-12-26 9:45 ` drm_vm.c:drm_mmap: possible circular locking dependency detected " Borislav Petkov
2009-12-28 0:40 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-30 21:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-30 21:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-12-30 22:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-31 8:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-12-31 19:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-01 13:58 ` [PATCH] sysfs: Cache the last sysfs_dirent to improve readdir scalability Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-01 15:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-01-01 18:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-01 22:43 ` [PATCH] sysfs: Cache the last sysfs_dirent to improve readdir scalability v2 Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-01 23:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-02 5:59 ` Greg KH
2010-01-02 15:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-01-01 15:16 ` drm_vm.c:drm_mmap: possible circular locking dependency detected (was: Re: Linux 2.6.33-rc2 - Merry Christmas ...) Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-02 2:59 ` drm_vm.c:drm_mmap: possible circular locking dependency detected Tejun Heo
2010-01-02 21:37 ` [PATCH] sysfs: Add lockdep annotations for the sysfs active reference Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-03 0:02 ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-17 16:26 ` Ming Lei
2010-01-17 17:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-17 18:03 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2010-01-02 21:49 ` drm_vm.c:drm_mmap: possible circular locking dependency detected Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-03 0:32 ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-03 2:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-03 5:01 ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-03 5:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-03 6:05 ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-03 7:47 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-01-03 10:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-03 11:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 19:16 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-01-04 18:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-01-04 19:43 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 21:12 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-01-04 23:09 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-31 8:40 ` drm_vm.c:drm_mmap: possible circular locking dependency detected (was: Re: Linux 2.6.33-rc2 - Merry Christmas ...) Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100117180351.GA17688@isilmar.linta.de \
--to=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=petkovbb@googlemail.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome