From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754335Ab0AQSOV (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:14:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754284Ab0AQSOV (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:14:21 -0500 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:35098 "EHLO www.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752883Ab0AQSOU (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:14:20 -0500 Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:17:02 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: Roel Kluin Cc: alan@linux.intel.com, Andrew Morton , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: Two branches the same in timbuart_set_mctrl() Message-ID: <20100117181702.026269e9@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <4B532CF5.7080000@gmail.com> References: <4B532CF5.7080000@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.18.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:29:57 +0100 Roel Kluin wrote: > Regardless of the condition, the branches execute the same code > > Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin > --- > Was this maybe intended? please review. I don't have data sheets and I'm very unwilling to play guess the intended behaviour in the absence of an actual bug report. I'd suggest you contanct the original author because as you note - somthing looks odd indeed. Alan