mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Driver-Core: devtmpfs - remove EXPERIMENTAL and enable it by  default
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:05:53 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100120220553.66af4fd7@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac3eb2511001200953g3fc2be3ay30174b0429707c93@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:53:49 +0100
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 15:58, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:03:41 -0800
> > Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> >> > removing experimental is fine... but setting it by default is a
> >> > bit over the top and very inconsistent with how the 'default'
> >> > option is used.
> >>
> >> Why?
> >
> > because the convention is that we use "default y" only for those
> > things that used to be on, and are now turned into a config option.
> 
> Oh, I never heard of such a convention. Sure, we can remove that "y",
> if this is the way it should be used, not be used.

For example in (this is just the first one google found, there's been a
bunch of discussion at various times)

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/706458

Linus was rather explicit:

The rule of thumb should be:

	NO NEW FEATURES SHOULD _EVER_ DEFAULT TO 'ON'!


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-21  6:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-14 21:47 Kay Sievers
2010-01-15 14:08 ` Stefan Richter
2010-01-15 18:02   ` Greg KH
2010-01-15 14:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-15 18:03   ` Greg KH
2010-01-15 20:57     ` Alan Cox
2010-01-16 15:51       ` Kay Sievers
2010-01-16 16:27         ` Alan Cox
2010-01-16 20:11         ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-17  7:56     ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-17 14:58     ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-01-20 17:53       ` Kay Sievers
2010-01-21  6:05         ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2010-01-21 16:37           ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100120220553.66af4fd7@infradead.org \
    --to=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome