mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Luca Barbieri <luca@luca-barbieri.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: perf record -g hangs the system
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:18:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100121111850.GD5017@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff13bc9a1001210310x5ebc9993kbf6b302285d2d9a4@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:10:12PM +0100, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> I'm experiencing a system lockup running the following command:
> perf record -g true
> 
> The system hangs and does not respond to any sysrq.
> No messages are printed to netconsole.
> 
> This is with 2.6.33-rc4 on an x86-32 Core 2 dual core machine.
> 
> Any tips on how to debug/fix this?



It should be fixed in latest linus's git tree with the
following patch:


commit c2c5d45d46c8c0fd34291dec958670ad4816796f
Author: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu Dec 31 03:52:25 2009 +0100

    perf: Stop stack frame walking off kernel addresses boundaries
    
    While processing kernel perf callchains, an bad entry can be
    considered as a valid stack pointer but not as a kernel address.
    
    In this case, we hang in an endless loop. This can happen in an
    x86-32 kernel after processing the last entry in a kernel
    stacktrace.
    
    Just stop the stack frame walking after we encounter an invalid
    kernel address.
    
    This fixes a hard lockup in x86-32.
    
    Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
    Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
    Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
    Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
    LKML-Reference: <1262227945-27014-1-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com>
    Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
index c56bc28..6d81755 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -123,13 +123,15 @@ print_context_stack_bp(struct thread_info *tinfo,
 	while (valid_stack_ptr(tinfo, ret_addr, sizeof(*ret_addr), end)) {
 		unsigned long addr = *ret_addr;
 
-		if (__kernel_text_address(addr)) {
-			ops->address(data, addr, 1);
-			frame = frame->next_frame;
-			ret_addr = &frame->return_address;
-			print_ftrace_graph_addr(addr, data, ops, tinfo, graph);
-		}
+		if (!__kernel_text_address(addr))
+			break;
+
+		ops->address(data, addr, 1);
+		frame = frame->next_frame;
+		ret_addr = &frame->return_address;
+		print_ftrace_graph_addr(addr, data, ops, tinfo, graph);
 	}
+
 	return (unsigned long)frame;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(print_context_stack_bp);


  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-21 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-21 11:10 Luca Barbieri
2010-01-21 11:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-01-21 12:19   ` Luca Barbieri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100121111850.GD5017@nowhere \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca@luca-barbieri.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®