From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752284Ab0AWWaR (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:30:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752095Ab0AWWaQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:30:16 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:58442 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751924Ab0AWWaO (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:30:14 -0500 Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:30:40 -0800 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Christian Kujau Cc: LKML , dhowells@redhat.com, adkulkar@umail.iu.edu Subject: Re: NFS_FSCACHE still depends on EXPERIMENTAL? Message-ID: <20100123143040.49f47e0d@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Intel X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by casper.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:35:39 -0800 (PST) Christian Kujau wrote: > Hi, > > there's currently an open Ubuntu bug[0], with the intent to compile > NFS_FSCACHE (and possibly AFS_FSCACHE, 9P_FSCACHE) into the standard > Ubuntu kernel. However, since *_FSCACHE still depends on > EXPERIMENTAL, this won't happen. since the EXPERIMENTAL flag more or less means nothing, the "it is marked with the flag so we don't do it" is reasoning based on more or less nothing... -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org