From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: mingo@elte.hu, eranian@google.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] perf_events: x86: Clean up hw_perf_*_all() implementation
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:07:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100127221122.057507285@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100127220745.027096123@chello.nl>
[-- Attachment #1: perf-x86-cleanup-enable-disable-all.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3092 bytes --]
Put the recursion avoidance code in the generic hook instead of
replicating it in each implementation.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
---
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -1099,15 +1099,8 @@ static int __hw_perf_event_init(struct p
static void p6_pmu_disable_all(void)
{
- struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
u64 val;
- if (!cpuc->enabled)
- return;
-
- cpuc->enabled = 0;
- barrier();
-
/* p6 only has one enable register */
rdmsrl(MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0, val);
val &= ~ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0_ENABLE;
@@ -1118,12 +1111,6 @@ static void intel_pmu_disable_all(void)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
- if (!cpuc->enabled)
- return;
-
- cpuc->enabled = 0;
- barrier();
-
wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0);
if (test_bit(X86_PMC_IDX_FIXED_BTS, cpuc->active_mask))
@@ -1135,17 +1122,6 @@ static void amd_pmu_disable_all(void)
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
int idx;
- if (!cpuc->enabled)
- return;
-
- cpuc->enabled = 0;
- /*
- * ensure we write the disable before we start disabling the
- * events proper, so that amd_pmu_enable_event() does the
- * right thing.
- */
- barrier();
-
for (idx = 0; idx < x86_pmu.num_events; idx++) {
u64 val;
@@ -1166,23 +1142,20 @@ void hw_perf_disable(void)
if (!x86_pmu_initialized())
return;
- if (cpuc->enabled)
- cpuc->n_added = 0;
+ if (!cpuc->enabled)
+ return;
+
+ cpuc->n_added = 0;
+ cpuc->enabled = 0;
+ barrier();
x86_pmu.disable_all();
}
static void p6_pmu_enable_all(void)
{
- struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
unsigned long val;
- if (cpuc->enabled)
- return;
-
- cpuc->enabled = 1;
- barrier();
-
/* p6 only has one enable register */
rdmsrl(MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0, val);
val |= ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0_ENABLE;
@@ -1193,12 +1166,6 @@ static void intel_pmu_enable_all(void)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
- if (cpuc->enabled)
- return;
-
- cpuc->enabled = 1;
- barrier();
-
wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, x86_pmu.intel_ctrl);
if (test_bit(X86_PMC_IDX_FIXED_BTS, cpuc->active_mask)) {
@@ -1217,12 +1184,6 @@ static void amd_pmu_enable_all(void)
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
int idx;
- if (cpuc->enabled)
- return;
-
- cpuc->enabled = 1;
- barrier();
-
for (idx = 0; idx < x86_pmu.num_events; idx++) {
struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[idx];
u64 val;
@@ -1417,6 +1378,10 @@ void hw_perf_enable(void)
if (!x86_pmu_initialized())
return;
+
+ if (cpuc->enabled)
+ return;
+
if (cpuc->n_added) {
/*
* apply assignment obtained either from
@@ -1461,6 +1426,10 @@ void hw_perf_enable(void)
cpuc->n_added = 0;
perf_events_lapic_init();
}
+
+ cpuc->enabled = 1;
+ barrier();
+
x86_pmu.enable_all();
}
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-27 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-27 22:07 [PATCH 0/4] perf x86 fixes Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-27 22:07 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf_events: x86: Fix event constraint masks Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-29 9:29 ` [tip:perf/core] perf_events, " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-27 22:07 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-01-29 9:30 ` [tip:perf/core] perf_events, x86: Clean up hw_perf_*_all() implementation tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-27 22:07 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf_events: x86: Implement westmere support Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-29 9:30 ` [tip:perf/core] perf_events, x86: Implement Intel Westmere support tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-27 22:07 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf_events: x86: Remove spurious counter reset from x86_pmu_enable() Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-29 9:30 ` [tip:perf/core] perf_events, " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-29 7:55 ` [PATCH 0/4] perf x86 fixes Ingo Molnar
2010-01-29 8:04 ` [PATCH 5/4] perf_events: Fix sample_period transfer on inherit Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-29 9:30 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100127221122.057507285@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome