From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756266Ab0A1QiN (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:38:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755909Ab0A1QiL (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:38:11 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f219.google.com ([209.85.219.219]:38002 "EHLO mail-ew0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755812Ab0A1QiK (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:38:10 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DrFssl+UELc8IU/Ua7nu+Jgkcki0s8EBZetuQm/49Yi7xpCZ8bz8fgtA9ScMliitF4 2tiMZ7qQOTmsqMimobcHSVhcb4mF5qAUzCAZDO95/xV1vqayvCUTVdZWSW/TSpHgAHHV tzh5A7rmF1OqxoBbw1m2qUEnvC7hLcm9RrdrU= Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:38:01 +0200 From: Pekka Paalanen To: Pavel Machek Cc: Stephane Marchesin , nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel list Subject: Re: [Nouveau] 2.6.33 vs. NVIDIA GForce GT 220 Message-ID: <20100128183801.2182c6f2@daedalus.pq.iki.fi> In-Reply-To: <6a89f9d51001271828t54a28002k21ec96692af196b9@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100112134335.GA21783@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20100123181817.GA2909@joi.lan> <201001231828.00557.koriakin@0x04.net> <20100126094740.GC10858@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <6a89f9d51001271828t54a28002k21ec96692af196b9@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.6; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:28:06 -0800 Stephane Marchesin wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 01:47, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > >> > > I tried enabling staging nvidia driver on GT220, but > >> > > apparently driver does not know about it. Unfortunately, I > >> > > have one of those cards here. > >> > > > >> > > (I wonder... is there better mailing list? MAINTAINERS > >> > > only lists linux-fbdev....) > >> > >> The list is nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org. And driver knows > >> about GT220 just fine, I've been using it for a month or two > >> on GT220 already. Don't bother > > > > Perhaps nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org should be added to > > MAINTAINERS? > > > >> about the "supported cards" lists in xf86-video-nouveau or > >> wherever else, the driver will happily bind to any nvidia > >> video card with known generation, even if nobody has seen that > >> precise model before. > > > > Unfortunately, the driver does not seem happy: > > > > Jan 18 12:56:38 pma kernel: [    0.491073] nvidiafb > > 0000:01:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16 > > Jan 18 12:56:38 pma kernel: [    0.491507] nvidiafb: Device ID: > > 10de0a20 > > Jan 18 12:56:38 pma kernel: [    0.491546] Chipset is 10de0a20 > > Jan 18 12:56:38 pma kernel: [    0.491584] nvidiafb: unknown > > NV_ARCH Jan 18 12:56:38 pma kernel: [    0.492119] vga16fb: > > initializing > > > > Hmm, but this is not nouveau, this is nvidiafb... And both nvidiafb and vga16fb are known make Nouveau misbehave: nvidiafb because it messes up the card state, and vga16fb because it does not do the fb driver hand-over, AFAIK. Relevant or not, I'd like to advertise our new troubleshooting page: http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/TroubleShooting I'm also adding the CCs that were dropped earlier. Was the original question in this thread about nvidiafb or Nouveau? Thanks. -- Pekka Paalanen http://www.iki.fi/pq/