mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>,
	laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, josh@joshtriplett.org,
	dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
	dhowells@redhat.com
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Subject: [patch 2/3] scheduler: add full memory barriers upon task switch at runqueue lock/unlock
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 15:52:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100131210013.446503342@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100131205254.407214951@polymtl.ca>

[-- Attachment #1: scheduler-use-spinlock-mb.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2950 bytes --]

Depends on:
"Create spin lock/spin unlock with distinct memory barrier"

A full memory barrier is wanted before and after runqueue data structure
modifications so these can be read safely by sys_membarrier without holding the
rq lock.

Adds no overhead on x86, because LOCK-prefixed atomic operations of the spin
lock/unlock already imply a full memory barrier. Combines the spin lock
acquire/release barriers with the full memory barrier to diminish the
performance impact on other architectures. (per-architecture spinlock-mb.h
should be gradually implemented to replace the generic version)

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
CC: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
CC: mingo@elte.hu
CC: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
CC: dipankar@in.ibm.com
CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org
CC: josh@joshtriplett.org
CC: dvhltc@us.ibm.com
CC: niv@us.ibm.com
CC: tglx@linutronix.de
CC: peterz@infradead.org
CC: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
CC: dhowells@redhat.com
---
 kernel/sched.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/kernel/sched.c	2010-01-31 14:59:42.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/sched.c	2010-01-31 15:09:51.000000000 -0500
@@ -893,7 +893,12 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(st
 	 */
 	spin_acquire(&rq->lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _THIS_IP_);
 
-	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
+	/*
+	 * Order mm_cpumask and rq->curr updates before following memory
+	 * accesses. Required by sys_membarrier().
+	 */
+	smp_mb__before_spin_unlock();
+	raw_spin_unlock_irq__no_release(&rq->lock);
 }
 
 #else /* __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW */
@@ -916,10 +921,15 @@ static inline void prepare_lock_switch(s
 	 */
 	next->oncpu = 1;
 #endif
+	/*
+	 * Order mm_cpumask and rq->curr updates before following memory
+	 * accesses. Required by sys_membarrier().
+	 */
+	smp_mb__before_spin_unlock();
 #ifdef __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
-	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irq__no_release(&rq->lock);
 #else
-	raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
+	raw_spin_unlock__no_release(&rq->lock);
 #endif
 }
 
@@ -5490,7 +5500,13 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible:
 	if (sched_feat(HRTICK))
 		hrtick_clear(rq);
 
-	raw_spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
+	raw_spin_lock_irq__no_acquire(&rq->lock);
+	/*
+	 * Order memory accesses before mm_cpumask and rq->curr updates.
+	 * Required by sys_membarrier() when prev != next. We only learn about
+	 * next later, so we issue this mb() unconditionally.
+	 */
+	smp_mb__after_spin_lock();
 	update_rq_clock(rq);
 	clear_tsk_need_resched(prev);
 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-01-31 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-31 20:52 [patch 0/3] introduce sys_membarrier(): process-wide memory barrier (v8) Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-01-31 20:52 ` [patch 1/3] Create spin lock/spin unlock with distinct memory barrier Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-02-01  7:25   ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-01 14:08     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-02-01  7:28   ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-01 14:10     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-02-01 15:22   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-01 15:41     ` Steven Rostedt
2010-01-31 20:52 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2010-02-01  7:33   ` [patch 2/3] scheduler: add full memory barriers upon task switch at runqueue lock/unlock Nick Piggin
2010-02-01  9:42     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-01 10:11       ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-01 10:36         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-01 10:49           ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-01 14:47             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-02-01 14:58               ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-01 15:23                 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-02-01 15:44                   ` Steven Rostedt
2010-02-01 16:00                   ` Mike Galbraith
2010-02-01 15:27   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-01 16:09     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-02-01 16:23       ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-01 16:48         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-02-01 16:56           ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-01 17:45             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-02-01 18:00               ` Steven Rostedt
2010-02-01 18:36               ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-01 19:56                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-02-01 20:42                   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-01 22:42                     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-02-01 20:33                 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-02-01 20:52                   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-01 22:39                     ` Steven Rostedt
2010-02-01 23:09                       ` Steven Rostedt
2010-02-01 17:13           ` Steven Rostedt
2010-02-01 17:34             ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-01 16:24       ` Steven Rostedt
2010-02-01 16:29         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-01 16:46           ` Steven Rostedt
2010-02-01 16:11     ` Steven Rostedt
2010-01-31 20:52 ` [patch 3/3] introduce sys_membarrier(): process-wide memory barrier (v8) Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100131210013.446503342@polymtl.ca \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=nmiell@comcast.net \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome