From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
hjl.tools@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [patch v2 4/4] ptrace: Add support for generic PTRACE_GETREGSET/PTRACE_SETREGSET
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:12:40 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100210191240.DC9E4CC@magilla.sf.frob.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Oleg Nesterov's message of Wednesday, 10 February 2010 14:18:26 +0100 <20100210131826.GA21196@redhat.com>
> +static int ptrace_regset(struct task_struct *task, int req, unsigned int type,
> + struct iovec *uiov)
^__user
> +{
> + const struct user_regset_view *view = task_user_regset_view(task);
> + const struct user_regset *regset = find_regset(view, type);
> + struct iovec kiov;
> +
> + if (!regset)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(&kiov, uiov, sizeof kiov))
> + return -EFAULT;
Since it's just two words, most places handling struct iovec seem to just
use two get_user() calls, which is probably more efficient.
Also, here is where this function would need to be split in half for
compat_ptrace_request() calls where it has to use struct compat_iovec.
> + // I am not sure. Afaics it is OK to pass the
> + // size which is less than n * size. If iov_len
> + // is bigger, we can silently truncate it, or
> + // even write the correct value back.
Modifying iov_len to report how much we accessed seems good to me. If we
do that, we should certainly allow a larger size for get, so userland can
just use a generic large buffer before even knowing the real size. I'm not
sure whether we should allow a smaller size, especially for set. I could
go either way.
Thanks,
Roland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-10 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-09 20:13 [patch v2 0/4] updated ptrace/core-dump patches for supporting xstate - V2 Suresh Siddha
2010-02-09 20:13 ` [patch v2 1/4] revert "x86: ptrace and core-dump extensions for xstate" Suresh Siddha
2010-02-09 22:54 ` [tip:x86/ptrace] Revert " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2010-02-09 20:13 ` [patch v2 2/4] x86, ptrace: regset extensions to support xstate Suresh Siddha
2010-02-09 22:54 ` [tip:x86/ptrace] x86, ptrace: Regset " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2010-02-10 1:30 ` [patch v2 2/4] x86, ptrace: regset " Roland McGrath
2010-02-10 10:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-02-10 11:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-02-10 15:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-02-10 18:26 ` Roland McGrath
2010-02-10 14:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-02-10 15:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-02-09 20:13 ` [patch v2 3/4] x86, ptrace: prepare regset get/set routines for user specified lengths Suresh Siddha
2010-02-09 22:55 ` [tip:x86/ptrace] x86, ptrace: Prepare " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2010-02-10 1:32 ` [patch v2 3/4] x86, ptrace: prepare " Roland McGrath
2010-02-09 20:13 ` [patch v2 4/4] ptrace: Add support for generic PTRACE_GETREGSET/PTRACE_SETREGSET Suresh Siddha
2010-02-09 22:55 ` [tip:x86/ptrace] " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2010-02-10 1:52 ` [patch v2 4/4] " Roland McGrath
2010-02-10 2:03 ` H.J. Lu
2010-02-10 3:07 ` Roland McGrath
2010-02-10 4:24 ` H.J. Lu
2010-02-10 13:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-02-10 19:12 ` Roland McGrath [this message]
2010-02-11 2:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-11 3:30 ` Roland McGrath
2010-02-10 1:12 ` [patch v2 0/4] updated ptrace/core-dump patches for supporting xstate - V2 Roland McGrath
2010-02-10 1:22 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-02-10 7:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-10 18:58 ` Roland McGrath
2010-02-11 2:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-11 3:45 ` Roland McGrath
2010-02-11 4:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100210191240.DC9E4CC@magilla.sf.frob.com \
--to=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome