From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: [patch 1/2] pci: Convert pci_lock to raw_spinlock
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:35:19 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100217143453.570657459@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100217143401.673569070@linutronix.de>
[-- Attachment #1: 0119.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4259 bytes --]
pci_lock must be a real spinlock in preempt-rt. Convert it to
raw_spinlock. No change for !RT kernels.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
diff --git a/drivers/pci/access.c b/drivers/pci/access.c
index db23200..fddeb63 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/access.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/access.c
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
* configuration space.
*/
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pci_lock);
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(pci_lock);
/*
* Wrappers for all PCI configuration access functions. They just check
@@ -32,10 +32,10 @@ int pci_bus_read_config_##size \
unsigned long flags; \
u32 data = 0; \
if (PCI_##size##_BAD) return PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER; \
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_lock, flags); \
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_lock, flags); \
res = bus->ops->read(bus, devfn, pos, len, &data); \
*value = (type)data; \
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_lock, flags); \
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_lock, flags); \
return res; \
}
@@ -46,9 +46,9 @@ int pci_bus_write_config_##size \
int res; \
unsigned long flags; \
if (PCI_##size##_BAD) return PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER; \
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_lock, flags); \
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_lock, flags); \
res = bus->ops->write(bus, devfn, pos, len, value); \
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_lock, flags); \
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_lock, flags); \
return res; \
}
@@ -78,10 +78,10 @@ struct pci_ops *pci_bus_set_ops(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_ops *ops)
struct pci_ops *old_ops;
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_lock, flags);
old_ops = bus->ops;
bus->ops = ops;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_lock, flags);
return old_ops;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_bus_set_ops);
@@ -135,9 +135,9 @@ static noinline void pci_wait_ucfg(struct pci_dev *dev)
__add_wait_queue(&pci_ucfg_wait, &wait);
do {
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- spin_unlock_irq(&pci_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pci_lock);
schedule();
- spin_lock_irq(&pci_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&pci_lock);
} while (dev->block_ucfg_access);
__remove_wait_queue(&pci_ucfg_wait, &wait);
}
@@ -149,11 +149,11 @@ int pci_user_read_config_##size \
int ret = 0; \
u32 data = -1; \
if (PCI_##size##_BAD) return PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER; \
- spin_lock_irq(&pci_lock); \
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&pci_lock); \
if (unlikely(dev->block_ucfg_access)) pci_wait_ucfg(dev); \
ret = dev->bus->ops->read(dev->bus, dev->devfn, \
pos, sizeof(type), &data); \
- spin_unlock_irq(&pci_lock); \
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pci_lock); \
*val = (type)data; \
return ret; \
}
@@ -164,11 +164,11 @@ int pci_user_write_config_##size \
{ \
int ret = -EIO; \
if (PCI_##size##_BAD) return PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER; \
- spin_lock_irq(&pci_lock); \
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&pci_lock); \
if (unlikely(dev->block_ucfg_access)) pci_wait_ucfg(dev); \
ret = dev->bus->ops->write(dev->bus, dev->devfn, \
pos, sizeof(type), val); \
- spin_unlock_irq(&pci_lock); \
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pci_lock); \
return ret; \
}
@@ -395,10 +395,10 @@ void pci_block_user_cfg_access(struct pci_dev *dev)
unsigned long flags;
int was_blocked;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_lock, flags);
was_blocked = dev->block_ucfg_access;
dev->block_ucfg_access = 1;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_lock, flags);
/* If we BUG() inside the pci_lock, we're guaranteed to hose
* the machine */
@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ void pci_unblock_user_cfg_access(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_lock, flags);
/* This indicates a problem in the caller, but we don't need
* to kill them, unlike a double-block above. */
@@ -424,6 +424,6 @@ void pci_unblock_user_cfg_access(struct pci_dev *dev)
dev->block_ucfg_access = 0;
wake_up_all(&pci_ucfg_wait);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_lock, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_unblock_user_cfg_access);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-17 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-17 14:35 [patch 0/2] pci: raw_spinlock annotations Thomas Gleixner
2010-02-17 14:35 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2010-03-19 21:49 ` [patch 1/2] pci: Convert pci_lock to raw_spinlock Jesse Barnes
2010-02-17 14:35 ` [patch 2/2] x86: Convert pci_config_lock " Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100217143453.570657459@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome