mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J.A. Magallón" <jamagallon@ono.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: NFSv4
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:23:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100219012322.3d323794@werewolf.home> (raw)

Hi all...

First of all, kudos for new nfs-utils. Now, nfs4 works automagically and
like a charm.

And now the hard part, some questions:

- I have read that nfs4 includes in the server the locking protocol, no
  need for separate lockd. But in my servers, it seems it is still running:

root      2198     2  0 Feb18 ?        00:00:00 [nfsiod]
root     23501     2  0 01:01 ?        00:00:00 [nfsd4]
root     23502     2  0 01:01 ?        00:00:00 [nfsd]
root     23503     2  0 01:01 ?        00:00:00 [nfsd]
root     23504     2  0 01:01 ?        00:00:00 [nfsd]
root     23505     2  0 01:01 ?        00:00:00 [nfsd]
root     23506     2  0 01:01 ?        00:00:00 [nfsd]
root     23507     2  0 01:01 ?        00:00:00 [nfsd]
root     23508     2  0 01:01 ?        00:00:00 [nfsd]
root     23509     2  0 01:01 ?        00:00:00 [nfsd]
root     23500     2  0 01:01 ?        00:00:00 [lockd]

  Is there any problem with it ? I suppose (correct me if I'm wrong)
  that this kernel lockd will only serve for v2 or v3 mounts,
  that locking for client nfs4 mounts will go through nfsd4.
  Is that right ?

- Why is there only 1 instance of v4 daemon ?

- Is there any page describing the advantages of v4 ? I will have to
  convince the department admin to activate v4 in his solaris boxen...;)

TIA

Notes: kernel is 2.6.33-rc8, nfs-utils are 1.2.2.

-- 
J.A. Magallon <jamagallon()ono!com>     \               Software is like sex:
                                         \         It's better when it's free

             reply	other threads:[~2010-02-19  0:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-19  0:23 J.A. Magallón [this message]
2010-02-19 19:19 ` NFSv4 Trond Myklebust

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100219012322.3d323794@werewolf.home \
    --to=jamagallon@ono.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome