mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: What's the right value for idle= (was: Re: [linux-pm] regression on P-II SMP)
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:36:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201002212136.03783.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1002212117540.9624@axis700.grange>

On Sunday 21 February 2010, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi
> 
> my 2xP-II@400MHz locks up with 2.6.32(.X) unless I specify "idle=*" on the 
> kernel command-line, where "*" is one of "poll," "mwait," "halt," and only 
> "nomwait" indeed locks it up. Last kernel known to work was 2.6.25. So, it 
> doesn't bother me all that much - I have a way to boot it, but maybe 
> someone would be interested to fix this (this system already has a few 
> quirks on the kernel command line, so, one more doesn't really hurt;)). 
> What interests me more - which of those shall I be using? From 
> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt it looks like "mwait" should be best 
> for me? Or should I be using "halt?" "Poll" does indeed fry CPUs - raises 
> sys temperatures to 50 / 60 degrees C. Power-saving is not that much of a 
> concern for me - I only run that system occasionally, but it shouldn't 
> produce more heat than it must;) And since this system does have a broken 
> ACPI (Compaq AP400), I wouldn't try to be too smart with it.

I guess "mwait" is the right one, but let's try to ask experts.

Rafael

       reply	other threads:[~2010-02-21 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.1002212117540.9624@axis700.grange>
2010-02-21 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-02-21 21:02   ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2010-02-22 21:52     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2010-02-21 21:11   ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-02-22 21:50     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201002212136.03783.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®