mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] memcg: dirty pages accounting and limiting infrastructure
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:59:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100222172938.GF3063@balbir.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100222155840.GC13823@redhat.com>

* Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> [2010-02-22 10:58:40]:

> 
> We seem to be doing same operation as existing "mem_cgroup_update_file_mapped"
> function is doing to udpate some stats. Can we just reuse that? We
> probably can create one core function which take index of stat to update
> and update_file_mapped and other variants for memcg dirty ratio can make
> use of it.
>

Good Point, it can be easily extended to be generic
 
> In fact instead of single function charge_dirty() accounting for
> WRITEBACK, we well as other states like UNSTABLE_NFS is not very intutive.
> May be we can have indivdual functions.
> 
> mem_cgroup_update_dirty()
> mem_cgroup_update_writeback()
> mem_cgroup_update_unstable_nfs() etc.
>

Hmm.. probably yes. 

-- 
	Three Cheers,
	Balbir

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-22 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-21 15:18 [RFC] [PATCH 0/2] memcg: per cgroup dirty limit Andrea Righi
2010-02-21 15:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] memcg: dirty pages accounting and limiting infrastructure Andrea Righi
2010-02-21 21:28   ` David Rientjes
2010-02-21 22:17     ` Andrea Righi
2010-02-22 18:07       ` Vivek Goyal
2010-02-23 11:58         ` Andrea Righi
2010-02-25 15:36           ` Minchan Kim
2010-02-26  0:23             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-26  4:50               ` Minchan Kim
2010-02-26  5:01                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-26  5:53                   ` Minchan Kim
2010-02-26  6:15                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-26  6:35                       ` Minchan Kim
2010-02-22  0:22   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-22 18:00     ` Andrea Righi
2010-02-22 21:21       ` David Rientjes
2010-02-22 19:31     ` Vivek Goyal
2010-02-23  9:58       ` Andrea Righi
2010-02-22 15:58   ` Vivek Goyal
2010-02-22 17:29     ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2010-02-23  9:26     ` Andrea Righi
2010-02-22 16:14   ` Balbir Singh
2010-02-23  9:28     ` Andrea Righi
2010-02-24  0:09       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-21 15:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] memcg: dirty pages instrumentation Andrea Righi
2010-02-21 21:38   ` David Rientjes
2010-02-21 22:33     ` Andrea Righi
2010-02-22  0:32   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-22 17:57     ` Andrea Righi
2010-02-22 16:52   ` Vivek Goyal
2010-02-23  9:40     ` Andrea Righi
2010-02-23  9:45       ` Andrea Righi
2010-02-23 19:56       ` Vivek Goyal
2010-02-23 22:22         ` David Rientjes
2010-02-25 14:34           ` Andrea Righi
2010-02-26  0:14             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-22 18:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-23  9:46     ` Andrea Righi
2010-02-23 21:29   ` Vivek Goyal
2010-02-25 15:12     ` Andrea Righi
2010-02-26 21:48       ` Vivek Goyal
2010-02-26 22:21         ` Andrea Righi
2010-02-26 22:28           ` Vivek Goyal
2010-03-01  0:47         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-21 23:48 ` [RFC] [PATCH 0/2] memcg: per cgroup dirty limit KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-22 14:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-02-22 17:36   ` Balbir Singh
2010-02-22 17:58     ` Vivek Goyal
2010-02-23  0:07       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-23 15:12         ` Vivek Goyal
2010-02-24  0:19           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-22 18:12   ` Andrea Righi
2010-02-22 18:29     ` Vivek Goyal
2010-02-22 21:15       ` David Rientjes
2010-02-23  9:55       ` Andrea Righi
2010-02-23 20:01         ` Vivek Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100222172938.GF3063@balbir.in.ibm.com \
    --to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arighi@develer.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suleiman@google.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®