From: Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net>
To: "Pádraig Brady" <P@draigBrady.com>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iTCO_wdt: Don't double the requested timeout
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:45:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100225084535.4658cbf9@marrow.netinsight.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B854F58.4050907@draigBrady.com>
(taking back lkml on CC. The discussion is about stopping watchdogs
before rebooting).
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:10:00 +0000
Pádraig Brady <P@draigBrady.com> wrote:
> > Returning to the initial issue (my patch to avoid stopping the watchdog
> > before reboot): What is the preferred behavior? I've looked in other
> > drivers, and see multiple ways being used. Some do as in my patch, some
> > leave it on unconditionally and some stop it unconditionally.
> >
> Well nowayout to me means userspace should have no way out,
> but when rebooting the system the watchdog should be reset.
> But in saying that I'm not sure what to do. At least there
> should be some way to select the operation you want above,
> so as to protect the reboot process itself.
Well, from the drives I saw that had this behavior (not that I checked
all of them), they did look at nowayout to determine whether to stop it
or not.
> In general, I wonder could an order be specified so that
> the watchdog is disabled as the very last thing by the kernel,
> right before it does the reboot?
Many other drivers use reboot notifiers, but unfortunately it seems
that these are called before device shutdown (kernel/sys.c), so it
wouldn't help here.
I guess it would be good to have defined and uniform behavior across
different watchdogs, and at least an option to specify
nowayout-also-when-rebooting.
// Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-25 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-23 15:40 [PATCH] iTCO_wdt: Don't stop on shutdown with nowayout Simon Kagstrom
2010-02-23 16:24 ` Pádraig Brady
2010-02-23 17:09 ` [PATCH] iTCO_wdt: Don't double the requested timeout Pádraig Brady
2010-02-24 9:16 ` Simon Kagstrom
2010-02-24 16:18 ` Pádraig Brady
2010-04-07 16:20 ` Pádraig Brady
[not found] ` <4B84FD15.9020803@draigBrady.com>
[not found] ` <20100224124730.6958b2c0@marrow.netinsight.se>
[not found] ` <4B8545D1.8000302@draigBrady.com>
[not found] ` <20100224165526.61cdd169@marrow.netinsight.se>
[not found] ` <4B854F58.4050907@draigBrady.com>
2010-02-25 7:45 ` Simon Kagstrom [this message]
2010-02-24 6:25 ` [PATCH] iTCO_wdt: Don't stop on shutdown with nowayout Simon Kagstrom
2010-03-07 15:16 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2010-03-08 7:51 ` Simon Kagstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100225084535.4658cbf9@marrow.netinsight.se \
--to=simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net \
--cc=P@draigBrady.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome