From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752540Ab0CCKUW (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 3 Mar 2010 05:20:22 -0500
Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:55866 "EHLO
	caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752032Ab0CCKUV (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 3 Mar 2010 05:20:21 -0500
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:19:57 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, swetland@google.com,
       kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: board/device file names, and machine names
Message-ID: <20100303101957.GA9848@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1267565398.8759.77.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <20100302235137.GC29715@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1267576760.8759.164.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <20100303084244.GD29715@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20100303091728.GA31740@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20100303094757.GB22482@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20100303100022.GA7175@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20100303100847.GA30607@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20100303101759.GA10499@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100303101759.GA10499@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:18:00AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> > > > > > Given the amount of discussion there's already been, I'm going to come
> > > > > > down hard on this issue to kill the discussion.
> 
> > > So... dwalker is maintainer of arch-msm, and does not like the
> > > codenames. Then you come, and just because are maintainer of arm,
> > > override the decision, without even notifying l-k?
> > 
> > So you don't think that Daniel, who was *explicitly* asking for my
> > suggestions and opinions, is entitled to a clear and straight
> > answer?
> 
> When someone asks for your suggestions, you can "go down hard on this
> issue"?

It's clear that all you want to have is an argument.  This ends here.