From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754984Ab0CEQW2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:22:28 -0500 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:40253 "EHLO www.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754861Ab0CEQW1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:22:27 -0500 Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:23:27 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: Linus Torvalds Cc: David Miller , daniel@fooishbar.org, skeggsb@gmail.com, airlied@linux.ie, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, dri-devel@lists.sf.net, mingo@elte.hu Subject: Re: [git pull] drm request 3 Message-ID: <20100305162327.084d4038@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <20100305151754.GB2505@tempa> <20100305.072612.186421758.davem@davemloft.net> <20100305154009.GC2505@tempa> <20100305.074835.159078083.davem@davemloft.net> <20100305160217.663413eb@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.18.6; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > So the watershed moment was _never_ the "Linus merged it". The watershed > moment was always "Fedora started shipping it". That's when the problems > with a standard upstream kernel started. > > Why is that so hard for people to understand? So why are you screaming at the DRM and Nouveau people about the breakage ? That's the bit I really don't understand. Alan