From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755180Ab0CEVNi (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:13:38 -0500 Received: from ksp.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.206]:39551 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754170Ab0CEVNh (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:13:37 -0500 Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 22:13:30 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Matthew Garrett Cc: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" , Randy Dunlap , Ingo Molnar , H Peter Anvin , Thomas Gleixner , Len Brown , Dave Jones , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] x86: Manage ENERGY_PERF_BIAS based on cpufreq governor Message-ID: <20100305211329.GC20554@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20100303000649.757684000@intel.com> <20100303000849.278509000@intel.com> <4B8DADB9.1040302@xenotime.net> <20100303215453.GG2579@ucw.cz> <1267662469.16916.1020.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20100305091949.GA31554@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <7C53B33EE871F14797C999838AA8B5A914ACD58C@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> <20100305204029.GB20554@elf.ucw.cz> <20100305205522.GA15489@srcf.ucam.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100305205522.GA15489@srcf.ucam.org> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri 2010-03-05 20:55:22, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 09:40:29PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > That can be only true if it does not give benefits period... AC and > > battery power are quite different scenarios. > > No, they're not. Yes, they are. Would you care to elaborate? I may very well want top power on AC power, and max powersavings on battery; most people do. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html