From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Akira Fujita <a-fujita@rs.jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: defrag deployment status (was Re: [PATCH] ext4: allow defrag (EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT) in 32bit compat mode)
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:53:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003080853.42978.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B94367E.9080506@garzik.org>
Am Montag 08 März 2010 00:27:58 schrieb Jeff Garzik:
> I'm curious, what is the overall deployment status of ext4 defragging?
> I actually worked on this problem years ago[1], and am hopeful that I
> will see defragging in a Linux distribution sometime in my lifetime! ;-)
I had to make the following patch. (There was the same patch already on the
e2fsprogs mailing list, but I cannot find that at the moment. Would be good
if this patch can make it into the next version).
--- a/misc/e4defrag.c
+++ b/misc/e4defrag.c
@@ -1605,7 +1605,7 @@ static int file_defrag(const char *file, const struct stat64 *buf,
return 0;
}
- fd = open64(file, O_RDONLY);
+ fd = open64(file, O_RDWR);
if (fd < 0) {
if (mode_flag & DETAIL) {
PRINT_FILE_NAME(file);
I did use it on two machines and it does not seem to break anything.
Some bigger things are missing in the e4defrag tool:
- make the indirect to extend change for old files - e.g. converted ext3
file systems. Adding the MIGRATE ioctl does not look very hard, but who knows?
- defragging directories (and also remove deleted entries)
- free space optimization is only done as a side effect
- overall layout considerations (e.g. putting files close to its directory or
use the atime to move often used files to the beginning of a disk etc.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-08 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-07 20:32 [PATCH] ext4: allow defrag (EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT) in 32bit compat mode Christian Borntraeger
2010-03-07 23:27 ` defrag deployment status (was Re: [PATCH] ext4: allow defrag (EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT) in 32bit compat mode) Jeff Garzik
2010-03-08 5:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-03-08 7:53 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2010-03-08 15:33 ` David Newall
2010-03-08 16:00 ` Christian Borntraeger
2010-03-08 16:22 ` jim owens
2010-03-08 16:31 ` Greg Freemyer
2010-03-08 17:11 ` jim owens
2010-03-09 13:23 ` jim owens
2010-03-08 19:38 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-03-08 20:48 ` jim owens
2010-03-09 16:19 ` David Newall
2010-03-08 5:47 ` [PATCH] ext4: allow defrag (EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT) in 32bit compat mode Eric Sandeen
2010-03-08 8:42 ` Akira Fujita
2010-03-12 7:01 ` [PATCH resend] " Christian Borntraeger
2010-04-02 21:48 ` [PATCH] " tytso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003080853.42978.borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=a-fujita@rs.jp.nec.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome