From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753649Ab0CHJxp (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2010 04:53:45 -0500 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:60473 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753334Ab0CHJxm (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2010 04:53:42 -0500 Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:53:37 +0100 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= To: dave b Cc: Daniel Mack , Mikael Pettersson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: weirdness with compiling a 2.6.33 kernel on arm debian Message-ID: <20100308095337.GB27502@pengutronix.de> References: <25ae2d691003051958x72040b47g29d842f1d389a6cf@mail.gmail.com> <19346.6765.457769.167118@pilspetsen.it.uu.se> <25ae2d691003060224x67ab1c9au5102c8a22518aff@mail.gmail.com> <20100306104131.GV28972@buzzloop.caiaq.de> <25ae2d691003061705l5fc0bca7n4a07f558a0c410cf@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <25ae2d691003061705l5fc0bca7n4a07f558a0c410cf@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:215:17ff:fe12:23b0 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ukl@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 12:05:21PM +1100, dave b wrote: > Ok... however how should one test the memory of an arm machine? ... > memtest is only for x86. *I am referring to the kernel memtest and not > memtest86. The easiest is: rerun make and check if it fails at exactly the same place. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |