From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset: current_cpuset_is_being_rebound() need rcu lock
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:03:03 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100312085807.950B.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100311190759.GA6298@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 02:46:15PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > rcu lockdep detected cpuset have wrong rcu usage.
> > the fixing is trivial. but I wonder why don't cpuset_being_rebound assignment
> > and read need a memory barrier pairing?
>
> The fix is in -tip, commit 99ee4ca746dda71326db7645463b4075ac1d665c.
>
> This is an initialization-time use of rcu_dereference(), so no other
> task has a reference to this data. Hence it is constant. Other uses
> of this code operate on shared data structures, which might change at
> any time.
thanks. I haven't notice such commit.
I think you are talking about task_cs(current) accessing and you are right
in such point.
but I'm talking cpuset_being_rebound global variable.
update_tasks_nodemask() has following code
static void update_tasks_nodemask(struct cpuset *cs, const nodemask_t *oldmem,
struct ptr_heap *heap)
{
cpuset_being_rebound = cs; /* start transaction */
cgroup_scan_tasks(&scan);
cpuset_being_rebound = NULL; /* end transaction */
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-12 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-11 5:46 KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-03-11 19:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-12 0:03 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2010-03-12 2:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-12 2:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100312085807.950B.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome