From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751600Ab0CSDBq (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:01:46 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:42117 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750999Ab0CSDBp (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:01:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:02:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20100318.200205.59696640.davem@davemloft.net> To: tj@kernel.org Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <4BA2DF0B.9080600@kernel.org> References: <20100319013119.GB22095@nowhere> <20100318.185757.39197211.davem@davemloft.net> <4BA2DF0B.9080600@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Tejun Heo Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:18:51 +0900 > On 03/19/2010 10:57 AM, David Miller wrote: >> I would use u64 so something like: >> >> u64 [FTRACE_MAX_PROFILE_SIZE / sizeof(u64)] > > DIV_ROUND_UP() would be safer than division There's potential real trouble if it isn't a multiple of sizeof(u64) so better: BUILD_BUG_ON(FTRACE_MAX_PROFILE_SIZE % sizeof(u64)); :-) What a mess, just because this thing can't be typed properly :-/