From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752186Ab0CRVgi (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:36:38 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:51400 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751705Ab0CRVgh (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:36:37 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Alan Stern Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC][PATCH] PM: Update device power management document Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:38:55 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.34-rc1-rjw; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Randy Dunlap , pm list , LKML References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003182238.55618.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 18 March 2010, Alan Stern wrote: > Rafael: > > Here's my updated version of your patch. It's meant as a replacement, > rather than an additional patch. I used much of your text but I also > altered a lot. And the new documentation describes the way things will > be after Dominik Brodowski's change is added, rather than the way > things are now. Thanks! I agree with all of the changes you made. > Attribution of authorship for changes like this is difficult; the > existing conventions don't make allowance for patches with multiple > authors. You'll have to figure out the right way to handle it. I think I'll covert your version into a patch on top of mine for this purpose. That's a bit artificial, but it will reflect who did what correctly, which also is important (and the Randy's "Reviewed-by" for my patch will be preserved this way). Rafael