From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756678Ab0CXRr2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:47:28 -0400 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:40376 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756619Ab0CXRr0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:47:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:47:14 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Kyungmin Park Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Samsung SoCs: OneNAND support Message-ID: <20100324174713.GC26910@sirena.org.uk> References: <20100324080454.GA24277@july> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100324080454.GA24277@july> X-Cookie: BOFH excuse User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 05:04:54PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > Samsung SoCs, s5pc6442, s5pc100, and s5pc110 has own OneNAND controller > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park It's probably worth pointing out that this depends on the previously posted addition of cpu_is_() for the Samsung CPUs which Ben hasn't applied - the merge at least will need to be coordinated with that.