From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Americo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Spencer Candland <spencer@bluehost.com>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC,PATCH 2/2] cputimers/proc: do_task_stat()->thread_group_times() is racy and O(n) under ->siglock
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:45:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100324204554.GA31780@redhat.com> (raw)
Nowadays ->siglock is overloaded, it would be really nice to change
do_task_stat() to walk through the list of threads lockless. And note
that we are doing while_each_thread() twice!
while_each_thread() is rcu-safe, but thread_group_times() also needs
->siglock to serialize the modifications of signal_struct->prev_Xtime
members.
(however, please note that currently do_task_stat() can race with
wait_task_zombie() which calls thread_group_times() without siglock).
This patch changes the code back to use thread_group_cputime(), as we
did before 0cf55e1e "sched, cputime: Introduce thread_group_times()".
Of course, this makes the output from /proc/pid/stat less accurate, but
otoh this allows us to make do_task_stat() (apart from ->tty bits).
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
fs/proc/array.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- 34-rc1/fs/proc/array.c~PROC_5_DTS_TGTS_IS_PITA 2010-03-24 20:47:19.000000000 +0100
+++ 34-rc1/fs/proc/array.c 2010-03-24 20:47:51.000000000 +0100
@@ -403,6 +403,7 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct seq_file
if (lock_task_sighand(task, &flags)) {
struct signal_struct *sig = task->signal;
+ struct task_cputime cputime;
if (sig->tty) {
struct pid *pgrp = tty_get_pgrp(sig->tty);
@@ -433,8 +434,11 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct seq_file
min_flt += sig->min_flt;
maj_flt += sig->maj_flt;
- thread_group_times(task, &utime, &stime);
+
gtime = cputime_add(gtime, sig->gtime);
+ thread_group_cputime(task, &cputime);
+ utime = cputime.utime;
+ stime = cputime.stime;
}
sid = task_session_nr_ns(task, ns);
next reply other threads:[~2010-03-24 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-24 20:45 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2010-03-24 20:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-25 12:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-25 12:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-26 7:59 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100324204554.GA31780@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=spencer@bluehost.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome