From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754386Ab0CYLWR (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:22:17 -0400 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:40902 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753976Ab0CYLWQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:22:16 -0400 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] Direct compact when a high-order allocation fails Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Andrew Morton , Andrea Arcangeli , Christoph Lameter , Adam Litke , Avi Kivity , David Rientjes , Rik van Riel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org In-Reply-To: <20100319101016.GS12388@csn.ul.ie> References: <20100319152516.8778.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100319101016.GS12388@csn.ul.ie> Message-Id: <20100325202145.6C92.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.50.07 [ja] Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:22:10 +0900 (JST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Viewpoint 5. end user surprising > > > > lumpy reclaim can makes swap-out even though the system have lots free > > memory. end users very surprised it and they can think it is bug. > > > > Also, this swap activity easyly confuse that an administrator decide when > > install more memory into the system. > > > > Compaction in this case is a lot less surprising. If there is enough free > memory, compaction will trigger automatically without any reclaim. I fully agree this.