From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: jirislaby@gmail.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC 11/15] PM / Hibernate: add chunk i/o support
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:38:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003252338.48513.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1269361063-3341-11-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.cz>
On Tuesday 23 March 2010, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Chunk support is useful when not writing whole pages at once. It takes
> care of joining the buffers into the pages and writing at once when
> needed.
>
> In the end when pages are compressed they use this interface as well
> (because they are indeed shorter than PAGE_SIZE).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
> Cc: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
> ---
> kernel/power/block_io.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/power/power.h | 6 +++
> 2 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/power/block_io.c b/kernel/power/block_io.c
> index 2b7898a..37412f7 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/block_io.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/block_io.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> *
> * Copyright (C) 1998,2001-2005 Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
> * Copyright (C) 2006 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> + * Copyright (C) 2004-2008 Nigel Cunningham (nigel at tuxonice net)
> *
> * This file is released under the GPLv2.
> */
> @@ -14,6 +15,9 @@
>
> #include "power.h"
>
> +static char *sws_writer_buffer;
> +static unsigned long sws_writer_buffer_pos;
> +
> /**
> * submit - submit BIO request.
> * @rw: READ or WRITE.
> @@ -74,6 +78,83 @@ int sws_bio_write_page(pgoff_t page_off, void *addr, struct bio **bio_chain)
> virt_to_page(addr), bio_chain);
> }
>
> +int sws_rw_buffer_init(int writing)
> +{
> + BUG_ON(sws_writer_buffer || sws_writer_buffer_pos);
Please don't do that. Fail the operation instead. You can also use WARN_ON
or WARN if you _really_ want the user to notice the failure.
BUG_ON's like this are annoying like hell for testers who trigger them.
> + sws_writer_buffer = (void *)get_zeroed_page(__GFP_WAIT | __GFP_HIGH);
> + if (sws_writer_buffer && !writing)
> + sws_writer_buffer_pos = PAGE_SIZE;
> +
> + return sws_writer_buffer ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * sws_rw_buffer - combine smaller buffers into PAGE_SIZE I/O
> + * @writing: Bool - whether writing (or reading).
> + * @buffer: The start of the buffer to write or fill.
> + * @buffer_size: The size of the buffer to write or fill.
> + **/
> +int sws_rw_buffer(int writing, char *buffer, int buffer_size)
> +{
> + int bytes_left = buffer_size, ret;
> +
> + while (bytes_left) {
> + char *source_start = buffer + buffer_size - bytes_left;
> + char *dest_start = sws_writer_buffer + sws_writer_buffer_pos;
> + int capacity = PAGE_SIZE - sws_writer_buffer_pos;
> + char *to = writing ? dest_start : source_start;
> + char *from = writing ? source_start : dest_start;
> +
> + if (bytes_left <= capacity) {
> + memcpy(to, from, bytes_left);
> + sws_writer_buffer_pos += bytes_left;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /* Complete this page and start a new one */
> + memcpy(to, from, capacity);
> + bytes_left -= capacity;
> +
> + if (writing) {
> + ret = sws_io_ops->write_page(sws_writer_buffer, NULL);
> + clear_page(sws_writer_buffer);
Why do we need that clear_page()?
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
Please move these two lines out of the if()/else.
> + } else {
> + ret = sws_io_ops->read_page(sws_writer_buffer, NULL);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + sws_writer_buffer_pos = 0;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int sws_rw_buffer_flush_page(int writing)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + if (writing && sws_writer_buffer_pos)
> + ret = sws_io_ops->write_page(sws_writer_buffer, NULL);
> + sws_writer_buffer_pos = writing ? 0 : PAGE_SIZE;
> + return ret;
> +}
I'd split the above into two functions, one for writing and the other for
reading.
Doing the same with sws_rw_buffer() (under a better name), for the sake of
clarity, also might make some sense, apparently.
> +
> +int sws_rw_buffer_finish(int writing)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + ret = sws_rw_buffer_flush_page(writing);
> +
> + free_page((unsigned long)sws_writer_buffer);
> + sws_writer_buffer = NULL;
> + sws_writer_buffer_pos = 0;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> int sws_wait_on_bio_chain(struct bio **bio_chain)
> {
> struct bio *bio;
> diff --git a/kernel/power/power.h b/kernel/power/power.h
> index 0f08de4..50a888a 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/power.h
> +++ b/kernel/power/power.h
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
> #include <linux/utsname.h>
> #include <linux/freezer.h>
>
> +struct swap_map_handle;
> +
> struct swsusp_info {
> struct new_utsname uts;
> u32 version_code;
> @@ -161,6 +163,10 @@ extern int sws_bio_read_page(pgoff_t page_off, void *addr,
> extern int sws_bio_write_page(pgoff_t page_off, void *addr,
> struct bio **bio_chain);
> extern int sws_wait_on_bio_chain(struct bio **bio_chain);
> +extern int sws_rw_buffer_init(int writing);
> +extern int sws_rw_buffer_finish(int writing);
> +extern int sws_rw_buffer_flush_page(int writing);
> +extern int sws_rw_buffer(int writing, char *buffer, int buffer_size);
>
> struct timeval;
> /* kernel/power/swsusp.c */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-25 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-23 16:17 [RFC 01/15] FS: libfs, implement simple_write_to_buffer Jiri Slaby
2010-03-23 16:17 ` [RFC 02/15] PM / Hibernate: snapshot cleanup Jiri Slaby
2010-03-24 20:29 ` Pavel Machek
2010-03-24 22:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-25 5:29 ` Pavel Machek
2010-03-23 16:17 ` [RFC 03/15] PM / Hibernate: separate block_io Jiri Slaby
2010-03-24 20:30 ` Pavel Machek
2010-03-24 21:22 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-03-24 22:58 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-03-25 2:35 ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2010-03-25 20:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-25 20:13 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-03-25 20:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-25 20:36 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-03-29 13:30 ` Pavel Machek
2010-03-25 14:29 ` Pavel Machek
2010-03-23 16:17 ` [RFC 04/15] PM / Hibernate: move the first_sector out of swsusp_write Jiri Slaby
2010-03-24 20:31 ` Pavel Machek
2010-03-25 21:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-23 16:17 ` [RFC 05/15] PM / Hibernate: group swap ops Jiri Slaby
2010-03-25 21:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-23 16:17 ` [RFC 06/15] PM / Hibernate: swap, remove swap_map_handle usages Jiri Slaby
2010-03-24 20:33 ` Pavel Machek
2010-03-24 21:29 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-03-25 21:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-23 16:17 ` [RFC 07/15] PM / Hibernate: add sws_modules_ops Jiri Slaby
2010-03-24 20:36 ` Pavel Machek
2010-03-24 21:31 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-03-25 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-23 16:17 ` [RFC 08/15] PM / Hibernate: add user module_ops Jiri Slaby
2010-03-25 22:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-26 9:43 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-03-23 16:17 ` [RFC 09/15] PM / Hibernate: user, implement user_ops writer Jiri Slaby
2010-03-24 20:42 ` Pavel Machek
2010-03-24 21:40 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-03-25 21:36 ` Pavel Machek
2010-03-25 22:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-26 9:34 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-03-26 22:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-29 15:33 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-03-27 7:02 ` Pavel Machek
2010-03-23 16:17 ` [RFC 10/15] PM / Hibernate: user, implement user_ops reader Jiri Slaby
2010-03-25 5:30 ` what the patches do " Pavel Machek
2010-03-25 5:42 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-03-25 6:12 ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2010-03-25 20:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-25 20:21 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-03-25 20:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-25 20:35 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-03-25 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-25 21:26 ` Pavel Machek
2010-03-25 21:49 ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2010-04-02 6:36 ` Pavel Machek
2010-04-02 17:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-25 22:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-23 16:17 ` [RFC 11/15] PM / Hibernate: add chunk i/o support Jiri Slaby
2010-03-25 22:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-03-26 9:09 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-03-26 10:02 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-03-23 16:17 ` [RFC 12/15] PM / Hibernate: split snapshot_read_next Jiri Slaby
2010-03-25 22:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-23 16:17 ` [RFC 13/15] PM / Hibernate: split snapshot_write_next Jiri Slaby
2010-03-25 22:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-23 16:17 ` [RFC 14/15] PM / Hibernate: dealign swsusp_info Jiri Slaby
2010-03-25 22:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-23 16:17 ` [RFC 15/15] PM / Hibernate: move non-swap code to snapshot.c Jiri Slaby
2010-03-25 22:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-23 21:51 ` [RFC 01/15] FS: libfs, implement simple_write_to_buffer Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-23 22:09 ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2010-03-24 22:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003252338.48513.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ncunningham@crca.org.au \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome