From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752932Ab0CZQ7P (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:59:15 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:55418 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752626Ab0CZQ7G (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:59:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:59:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20100326.095929.04683456.davem@davemloft.net> To: richih.mailinglist@gmail.com Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Patch] fix packet loss and massive ping spikes with PPP multi-link From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <2d460de71003260850x7f90d04cy79ac853464108182@mail.gmail.com> <20100326160226.0159ac3b@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Richard Hartmann Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:39:27 +0100 > At least the last-level support of Telefonica and QSC was definite > and adamant about not enabling fragmentation on _any_ PPP > multi-link, ever. I'm sure we can find just as many counter examples. I doubt we'll ever be able to change the default here, sorry.