From: Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
To: Marcelo Roberto Jimenez <mroberto@cpti.cetuc.puc-rio.br>
Cc: Dmitry Artamonow <mad_soft@inbox.ru>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: mach-sa1100: Fix for the use of wrong CPU_FREQ code in nanoengine.
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 23:07:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100327230727.10def37d.kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1269640391-23451-1-git-send-email-mroberto@cpti.cetuc.puc-rio.br>
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:53:10 -0300
Marcelo Roberto Jimenez <mroberto@cpti.cetuc.puc-rio.br> wrote:
> This patch selects the right CPU_FREQ module to use with nanoengine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Roberto Jimenez <mroberto@cpti.cetuc.puc-rio.br>
I think you should add more information regarding the patch.
Like addition of memory, extending the sdram_params->name length,
Cleaning up header content and order.
Just looking at the commit message it doesnt cover everything thats done.
Also, for me this doesnt apply at all. It might be my setup
being corrupt, but is it synced with latest git?
Patch number 2 doesnt either apply for me.
Best wishes
Kristoffer
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-sa1100/Kconfig | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/Kconfig
> index e6ce667..403db50 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/Kconfig
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ config SA1100_LART
>
> config SA1100_NANOENGINE
> bool "nanoEngine"
> - select CPU_FREQ_SA1100
> + select CPU_FREQ_SA1110
> help
> Say Y here if you are using the Bright Star Engineering nanoEngine.
> See <http://www.brightstareng.com/arm/nanoeng.htm> for information
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c b/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c
> index 63b32b6..7236fcd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c
> @@ -16,19 +16,17 @@
> *
> * The SDRAM type can be passed on the command line as cpu_sa1110.sdram=type
> */
> -#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> -#include <linux/types.h>
> -#include <linux/kernel.h>
> -#include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> -#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
>
> -#include <mach/hardware.h>
> #include <asm/cputype.h>
> #include <asm/mach-types.h>
> -#include <asm/system.h>
> +
> +#include <mach/hardware.h>
>
> #include "generic.h"
>
> @@ -37,7 +35,7 @@
> static struct cpufreq_driver sa1110_driver;
>
> struct sdram_params {
> - const char name[16];
> + const char name[20];
> u_char rows; /* bits */
> u_char cas_latency; /* cycles */
> u_char tck; /* clock cycle time (ns) */
> @@ -107,6 +105,15 @@ static struct sdram_params sdram_tbl[] __initdata = {
> .twr = 8,
> .refresh = 64000,
> .cas_latency = 3,
> + }, { /* Micron MT48LC8M16A2TG-75 */
> + .name = "MT48LC8M16A2TG-75",
> + .rows = 12,
> + .tck = 8,
> + .trcd = 20,
> + .trp = 20,
> + .twr = 8,
> + .refresh = 64000,
> + .cas_latency = 3,
> },
> };
>
> @@ -366,14 +373,14 @@ static int __init sa1110_clk_init(void)
> if (!name[0]) {
> if (machine_is_assabet())
> name = "TC59SM716-CL3";
> -
> if (machine_is_pt_system3())
> name = "K4S641632D";
> -
> if (machine_is_h3100())
> name = "KM416S4030CT";
> if (machine_is_jornada720())
> name = "K4S281632B-1H";
> + if (machine_is_nanoengine())
> + name = "MT48LC8M16A2TG-75";
> }
>
> sdram = sa1110_find_sdram(name);
> --
> 1.7.0.3
>
--
Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-27 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-26 21:53 Marcelo Roberto Jimenez
2010-03-26 21:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: mach-sa1100: fix checkpatch.pl issues Marcelo Roberto Jimenez
2010-03-27 22:07 ` Kristoffer Ericson [this message]
2010-03-27 22:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: mach-sa1100: Fix for the use of wrong CPU_FREQ code in nanoengine Marcelo Jimenez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100327230727.10def37d.kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com \
--to=kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mad_soft@inbox.ru \
--cc=mroberto@cpti.cetuc.puc-rio.br \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®