From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757360Ab0DFRyo (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:54:44 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:36369 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753072Ab0DFRyj (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:54:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:54:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20100406.105441.99879289.davem@davemloft.net> To: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl Cc: mingo@elte.hu, acme@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org, efault@gmx.de, fweisbec@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] IRQ disable vs NMI From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20100406132807.698467930@chello.nl> References: <20100406132807.698467930@chello.nl> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:28:07 +0200 > This patch set tries to solve the local_irq_disable() vs NMI problem > that SPARC has by providing new arch hooks and instrumenting the > existing interface to WARN on conflicting usage. Thanks Peter, looks good at first sight. I'll toss together the sparc bits and give this a go.