mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>
To: Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 32GB SSD on USB1.1 P3/700 == ___HELL___ (2.6.34-rc3)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:46:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100408194635.GA22583@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100407111702.GA3676@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de>

On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 01:17:02PM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Thank you for your reply, I'll test the patch ASAP (with large writes
> and Firefox sync mixed in), maybe this will improve things already.

Indeed, AFAICS this definitely seems MUCH better than before.
I had to do a full kernel rebuild (due to CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO
changes; with no changed configs though).
I threw some extra load into the mix (read 400MB instead of 300 through
USB1.1, ran gimp, grepped over the entire /usr partition etc.pp.),
so far not nearly as severe as before, and no OOMs either.
Launched Firefox some time after starting 400MB creation, pretty ok
still. Some annoying lags sometimes of course, but nothing absolutely
earth-shattering as experienced before.
Things really appear to be a LOT better.

OK, so which way to go?

Thanks a lot,

Andreas Mohr

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-08 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-04 22:13 Andreas Mohr
2010-04-04 23:31 ` Gábor Lénárt
2010-04-05 10:53 ` Andreas Mohr
2010-04-07  7:00   ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-07  7:08     ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-15  3:31       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15  4:19         ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-15  4:32           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15  4:41             ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-15  4:55               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-15  5:19                 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-16  3:16                   ` [PATCH] vmscan: page_check_references() check low order lumpy reclaim properly KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-16  4:26                     ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-16  5:33                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-16 21:18                     ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-13  2:54                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-07  8:39     ` 32GB SSD on USB1.1 P3/700 == ___HELL___ (2.6.34-rc3) Minchan Kim
2010-04-07  8:52       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-04-07 11:17     ` Andreas Mohr
2010-04-08 19:46       ` Andreas Mohr [this message]
2010-04-08 20:12 ` Bill Davidsen
2010-04-08 20:35   ` Andreas Mohr
2010-04-08 22:01     ` Bill Davidsen
2010-04-09 15:56     ` Ben Gamari

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100408194635.GA22583@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de \
    --to=andi@lisas.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®