From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757152Ab0DIIbh (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Apr 2010 04:31:37 -0400 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:59505 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756981Ab0DIIbe (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Apr 2010 04:31:34 -0400 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: Wu Fengguang Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "memory-hotplug: add 0x prefix to HEX block_size_bytes" Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Heiko Carstens , Americo Wang , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andi Kleen , Greg KH , Gerald Schaefer , "stable@kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <20100409014244.GB5644@localhost> References: <20100408212918.GA2716@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <20100409014244.GB5644@localhost> Message-Id: <20100409172442.80EF.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.50.07 [ja] Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:31:31 +0900 (JST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Hi Heiko, > > On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 05:29:18AM +0800, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 11:41:24PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 05:10:06PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > > >From: Heiko Carstens > > > > > > > >Revert ba168fc37dea145deeb8fa9e7e71c748d2e00d74 "memory-hotplug: add 0x prefix > > > >to HEX block_size_bytes" since it changes the user space visible sysfs interface > > > >/sys/devices/system/memory/block_size_bytes. > > > >The change breaks existing user space applications which rely on the fact that > > > >the output does not contain the "0x" prefix. > > > > > > Odd. > > > > > > Which application relies on this? Isn't the application which should > > > be fixed?? It should use something like strtoul() which doesn't > > > rely on '0x' prefix. > > > > Ok, consider it the other way round: your application is doing strtoul() > > with a base of 0 (since you rely on the 0x prefix) and for no good reason > > it doesn't work on older kernels. > > I really can't see a reason for adding additional pitfalls by _changing_ > > a long existing user space interface. > > Ack to revert it. Sorry for killing your time! I agree to revert, too. I guess nobody see my NAK for original mail (;_;)