From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: yinghai@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: ssh server etc doesn't work anymore with net-2.6
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:09:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100411100902.GA20141@gondor.apana.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100411.024352.209996508.davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 02:32:33 -0700
>
>> server side: 82576 with net-2.6
>> client side: opensuse 11.2 on thinkpad T61 wireless + vpnc
>
> I've pushed out a revert, we'll sort this out in net-next-2.6
> and meanwhile I've started a dialog with the Intel driver
> folks to see if there IGB chip has a problem with handling
> CHECKSUM_PARTIAL packets with a zero length data area.
>
> Thanks for your report.
I was confused at first as to whether it was CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY
that broke or CHECKSUM_PARTIAL.
After looking at the actual net-2.6 tree I see that it is actually
CHECKSUM_PARTIAL that caused this breakage.
The fact that when this was first implemented we didn't use hw
checksums on dataless packets might not have been an oversight
after all.
As I don't think such packets have been tested all by our kernel
on any NICs, and given the fact that IGB apparently broke, I think
the risk of this change is too high.
However, all is not lost as we can still adopt the approach of
the actual patch subject :) That is, we can use CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY
for packets checksummed locally by software.
This does need a lot more testing so it should spend some time
in net-next first.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-11 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-11 9:17 Yinghai Lu
2010-04-11 9:21 ` David Miller
2010-04-11 9:24 ` David Miller
2010-04-11 9:32 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-04-11 9:33 ` David Miller
2010-04-11 9:43 ` David Miller
2010-04-11 10:09 ` Herbert Xu [this message]
2010-04-11 12:04 ` Herbert Xu
2010-04-11 21:43 ` David Miller
2010-04-11 12:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] tcp: Handle CHECKSUM_PARTIAL for SYNACK packets for IPv4 Herbert Xu
2010-04-11 21:07 ` Yinghai
2010-04-11 22:00 ` David Miller
2010-04-11 12:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] tcp: Handle CHECKSUM_PARTIAL for SYNACK packets for IPv6 Herbert Xu
2010-04-11 12:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] inet: Remove unused send_check length argument Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100411100902.GA20141@gondor.apana.org.au \
--to=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®