From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Victor <avictor.za@gmail.com>
Cc: Anders Larsen <al@alarsen.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Julien Langer <julien.langer@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] AT91 slow-clock suspend: don't wait when turning PLLs off
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:10:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100412191006.GJ3048@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <w2ocd73a99e1004061427t322f8d4cmecd708ad16580f00@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 11:27:55PM +0200, Andrew Victor wrote:
> hi Anders,
>
> > From: Julien Langer <julien.langer@gmail.com>
> >
> > AT91: when turning off the PLLs during suspend, don't wait for the lock flag
> > to be set. Previously the code would always run into the loop limitation
> > of 1000 iterations because the flag is never set when turning the PLLs off.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Julien Langer <julien.langer@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Anders Larsen <al@alarsen.net>
> > Cc: Andrew Victor <avictor.za@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
>
> During suspend we set the MULA and MULB bits to 0 to disable the
> PLL's. When disabled, the PLLs will never "lock".
>
> Acked-by: Andrew Victor <linux@maxim.org.za>
>
>
> Russell: This is patch 5975/1 in the patch-system.
Thanks; I see your ack has been added to that patch. Should I assume that
this is for -rc rather than -devel?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-12 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-03 21:33 Anders Larsen
2010-04-06 21:27 ` Andrew Victor
2010-04-12 19:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-04-13 7:22 ` Andrew Victor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100412191006.GJ3048@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=al@alarsen.net \
--cc=avictor.za@gmail.com \
--cc=julien.langer@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®