From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753720Ab0DMUkj (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:40:39 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:56379 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753460Ab0DMUkQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:40:16 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:39:03 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Chase Douglas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , kernel-team Subject: Re: [REGRESSION 2.6.30][PATCH 1/1] sched: defer idle accounting till after load update period Message-Id: <20100413133903.9d38a6ee.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <1269870072-22449-1-git-send-email-chase.douglas@canonical.com> <1269870072-22449-2-git-send-email-chase.douglas@canonical.com> <20100401122740.a1ae80a7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 22:01:59 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Chase Douglas wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Thomas Gleixner seems to think this isn't the best approach (later > > email in this thread), so I'm deferring sending it unless someone is > > still interested in this approach. > > Well, it's a good workaround for now I think, I just answered Andrews > question whether we can't do any better :) > So... should we merge Chase's patch?