From: Guillaume Knispel <gknispel@proformatique.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Pending interrupts not always replayed
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:46:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100418164614.771d4f01@xilun.lan.proformatique.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100418053439.4d2ffe11@xilun.lan.proformatique.com>
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 05:34:39 +0200
Guillaume Knispel <gknispel@proformatique.com> wrote:
> From reading the code (kernel/irq stuffs), it seems that at least some
> handle_edge_irq based interrupts are not replayed when enabling if
> desc->chip->retrigger == NULL and on a platform where
> CONFIG_HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND is not set (which for now is only defined for
> (some?) arm and avr32). Depending on the pic this problem might
> be masked if multiple interrupts are received between disable_irq and
> enable_irq (maybe other conditions exist with controllers i don't know).
>
> I happen to program a PPC SoC (MPC8555E to be precise), using some edge
> interrupts on the PortC of the CPM2 pic (arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm2_pic.c)
> in a driver that does some enable_irq/disable_irq while various
> patterns of interrupts are received and i think i've hit the problem.
>
> Is the behavior intended (not always replaying edge triggered interrupts)
> or is it just a bug to fix?
>
> Anybody knows if it's safe to activate CONFIG_HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND for a
> powerpc or are there some known dangerous interactions?
> (I'll give it a try on my side in the meantime anyway)
A follow up on this issue and on my CONFIG_HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND tests:
I've basically done this:
Index: linux-2.6.22.18/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22.18.orig/arch/powerpc/Kconfig 2010-04-18 15:22:24.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.22.18/arch/powerpc/Kconfig 2010-04-18 15:23:21.000000000 +0200
@@ -35,6 +35,10 @@
bool
default y
+config HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND
+ bool
+ default y
+
config IRQ_PER_CPU
bool
default y
(yeah, I know, old kernel, but the code involved hasn't change much
since)
and of course +CONFIG_HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND=y in my .config
Now everything seems to work fine: my device was not previously not
interrupting anymore after typically 1 or 2 minutes (because the
interrupt signal stays at level low until the device is served, so
if one falling edge is missed no more interruption will ever be seen),
and right now it has been running for 1 hour without any observable
problem.
Cheers!
--
Guillaume Knispel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-18 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-18 3:34 Guillaume Knispel
2010-04-18 14:46 ` Guillaume Knispel [this message]
2010-04-18 19:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-04-19 13:09 ` Guillaume Knispel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100418164614.771d4f01@xilun.lan.proformatique.com \
--to=gknispel@proformatique.com \
--cc=Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®